Originally Posted by
giskard
Here's a slightly alternative view. A lot are concentrating on the pittance $11 is in comparison to what is gained by a resource like AULRO. I don't disagree.
I'll hazzard a guess here. For the majority, it won't be about $11. It won't be about the principal. It won't be about views on the value of information or help garnered. Of the 18k members, for 70, 80, 90%, the'll fade out or go somewhere else. They'll have the answer to a question that's been asked in a thread, go to reply and find that they can't. They'll search for a thread that they read earlier and find that they can't. Some will then subscribe. Most won't.
So what you've achieved is not cutting off 70% of the ingrate. You cut off 70% of your user base. Of your experience. Of your 'barter system'. A quiet forum is a dead forum, no matter how good the intentions are.
As an aside, I wonder what the renewal rate of the vendors will be in 12 months when the user base is 20-30% of what it once was.
Commercially, there may have been better alternatives. A sticky at the top of each sub-forum highlighting the benefits of subscribing. To be honest, when I joined, I went straight to the D3-D4 section and I've never left there. This is my first post outside of that section and had honestly forgotten about subscription till the site appeared broken and I got the moderator message at the top of the screen this morning.
A donation drive done quarterly with a donated prize (eg traxide or something similar) would earn plenty and keep the need to support a local forum in front of people's minds. There are plenty of ways.
Munting peoples access is never the answer. None of the above is said in malice and it's not intended as a whinge. I'll go subscribe now, but my fear is that we'll lose more than we gained by cutting off the 'freeloaders'. ;)
disco4.co.uk and their supporting vendors will probably thank you though...
Cheers,
G