Optically this lens is perfect. It has no mould, fluff, dirt, pubes or fingerprints on any of the elements and externally it looks new![]()
![]()
![]()
Im pretty sure nobody here wants this so hopefully i won't get reprimanded but I put a bit of humour into my ebay ad.
EBAY
So the description title has it for NikonThe product description has it for Canon
(Yes I see you provide the adapter ring)
Muppet doesnt want to work at Maccas, perhaps he could do work experience with you?![]()
Is this a ploy to get more people looking at your ad?
I resemble that remark.
Although somehow I think the market for this lens on a Land Rover site is pretty limited.
That is probably true. I will explain why I think that is the case.
In the same way that inferior vehicles like Land Cruisers and Patrols outsell Land Rovers, Canon and Nikon sell a lot of cameras.
Canon and Nikon sell a lot because for some people that is the only brands they have heard of.
In the same way that people who do their research about 4WDs and don't simply follow the crowd buy Land Rovers, people who do their research about cameras realise that Pentax produce a superior product.
I am assuming that the urge to be well informed about products carries over from 4WDs to cameras. So Land Rover drivers are more likely to realise the advantages of owning a Pentax.
Since your lens is suitable for Nikon and Canon, you might have done better to draw attention to your ebay ad on a Toyota or Nissan forum.
![]()
1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.
Canon and Nikon sell a lot because they are really good.
Pentax are good cameras. Superior. No.
My first camera was a Pentax.
My first car was a Datsun.
Then I bought NIKON F2 and a LAND ROVER Series IIA.
There's a pattern developing there.![]()
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks