Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 47 of 47

Thread: P76

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Godwin Beach Qld
    Posts
    8,688
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The Range Rover auto was the Chrysler 727 which was a 3 speed and never fitted to the Australian 2 door,the first of the 4 door vehicles got autos,post 86 they got the ZF 4 speed,which carried over into the Discovery models,the Range Rover originally had the 4 speed LT95 manual from the military 101 fitted into it and in 1985 got the LT77 five speed from the Triumph Spitfire in it,Leyland's way of a cheap 5spd,a little weak for the vehicle and it struggled when towing,I know,as I have a 85 LT 77 Rangie and a 99 Auto D1,so if the 77 dies it will get a ZF 4 speed in it,

    Even though I worked for Leyland Aust. I had never seen a P76 Wagon,it looks like a base model,nice looking vehicle,and would have sold well,Leyland's demise was helped by the then Govenment's auto manufacturing policy,the "Button Plan" which stated that Australia could only support 3 manufacturers,(with a little help from Ford,GMH,and Chrysler) plus a lot of mis-management,but that is all water under the bridge now,Chrysler went,now GMH ,soon followed by Ford shortly after,our once thriving automotive industry will be gone.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Mirboo North, Vic.
    Posts
    1,149
    Total Downloaded
    16.28 MB
    Pre the Factory 3 speed auto there was a sizable Non factory conversion industry that used Borgy 35's with the Ford type T bar shifter (Chrome ends) where the Factory fit was all black and flat rectangular shifter.

    Factory auto wasnt till the 4 doors.
    Charleston Green 1997 TDi Disco R380
    Silver 1986 Vogue
    Charcoal 1983 Range Rover 4 speed
    Silver 98 Volvo C70
    Red 88 740 HP Turbo
    Silver Volvo 740 Wagoon
    1998 Volvo S90 Royal
    W116's, C107 and a W123 onna stick

  3. #43
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tatura, Vic
    Posts
    6,336
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tony66_au View Post

    My opinion on the square bore/stroked 4.4 is that it made more HP and revved cleaner than the 3.5 but really didnt make much more torque down low.
    The 4.4 still puts out far more torque than a 4.1 XF Falcon.

    As for the BW 35 put behind a RR Classic, to me this is madness

    There is a mob in Melb called Ritters. They are a very highly regarded independent RR/LR specialist.

    Back in the early days of classics, they pioneered their own auto conversion and were smart enough to not use a BW box. They used a Ford C4.

    I had an 83 with this.

    I still stand by what I said. No V8 should have a BW 35 behind it.
    Dave.

    I was asked " Is it ignorance or apathy?" I replied "I don't know and I don't care."


    1983 RR gone (wish I kept it)
    1996 TDI ES.
    2003 TD5 HSE
    1987 Isuzu County

  4. #44
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,537
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tony66_au View Post


    ......
    My opinion on the square bore/stroked 4.4 is that it made more HP and revved cleaner than the 3.5 but really didnt make much more torque down low.
    I rather doubt it will be low down torque that kills auto transmissions - I suspect it will be either maximum torque (breakage or excess wear) or just plain maximum power (heat, or lubrication failure due to excess load on ger teeth or bearings).

    Irrelevant to this discussion, but note that this comment applies to V-8s and autos - by contrast, if you look at the reputation of the Isuzu, this will kill manual transmissions because of the low down torque, specifically by the torque pulses resulting from only four cylinders and a fairly light flywheel, plus this low down torque.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #45
    Davehoos Guest
    gear change quality that destroys most auto trans after over heating.
    fitting internals out of the last sigma or an EFI XE, planetary output shaft and 3 bolt reverse band servo etc was the cheap rebuild in the 90's. the casing that's an issue with left hand controls and mixed combinations of oil cooler outlets. in a T bar P76 that's not an issue.


    the last falcon ute fitted a BW 3 speed had an improved gearbox-final fling.
    don't think it is labelled BW40. the output shaft is shorter.


    I like the early hydrolic TH 700-R4 until you replace soft parts.


    My 1993 3.5 disco I have to hold of the throttle to keep it mobile towing. the lack of torque was the reason I didn't keep it running , driving it hard till the auto temp light came on any up hill rise. In a P76 you slug it out on a hill and listen to the ignition rattle.


    P/S I took my 88 out in the rural roads around the village to show the son storm damage. I was supprise that one hill in the falcon it didn't notice that the rover had to select 1st gear 35Km/h.-nearly went for low range. I often joked about the time our Bedford fire truck taking 45 minutes to drive the 10 km.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    86
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm not quite sure how this ended up in a "which gearbox should I put in my P76" subject.
    I was a committee club member for more than 10 years. The amount of "mystique" and miss truths associated with the P76 is amazing. If I had a dollar for all the people that used to come up to us at car shows saying that their father or mate had or has a Force 7 locked up in a shed or barn, I could have actually bought one of the nine that exist today.

    Someone mentioned earlier that there were 10 wagons made. Unfortunately, only 3 p76 wagons were made and only 1 survived after the company closure. They were all prototypes anyway and not quite ready for production.

    Discotwinturbo, the p76 Rallye was a one-off dealer made special for the Sydney motor show. Unless your name is Bruce Rose, then you must be thinking of a different P76 model. There was nothing mechanically special about it, other than some stripes and Targa wheels and Force 7 steering wheel. It was a plain super v8 as was the Targa Florio model. The Targa did get an LSD though.

    Quote Originally Posted by UncleHo View Post
    Leyland's demise was helped by the then Govenment's auto manufacturing policy,the "Button Plan" which stated that Australia could only support 3 manufacturers,(with a little help from Ford,GMH,and Chrysler)
    You are about 10 years too late with this comment, the "Button plan" came in the mid 80's.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    ferntree gully australia
    Posts
    1,408
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've just had a look at Leyland P76 v8 workshop manual , Capacity 4414cc( 269.7cu in ) Bore/Stroke . 3.500 in . bhp. 192 @4250 rpm. Max torque 285 lb/ft. @ 2500rpm . I always thought this should have been the motor for the Australian Range Rovers , It was a good engine in It's day . I have two of them , one in a 110 wagon , It's been in there for years now . So much better than the 3.5lt . Also have one in a 1976 Triumph Stag . Jim

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!