Our Tdci is quite comfortable at 110 km/h in 6th and the fuel consumption doesn't rise much.
Sent from my GT-P5210 using AULRO mobile app
Printable View
Our Tdci is quite comfortable at 110 km/h in 6th and the fuel consumption doesn't rise much.
Sent from my GT-P5210 using AULRO mobile app
We used to do that on salt pans with an FJ bonnet.
Towed it behind our old scrub hacks, usually a Ford Pilot, an Anglia or a
an FJ.
Dangerous game, but a lot fun when your a kid and have no fear!
The bonnets would get pretty warm on the salt pans though.
Cheers, Mick.
Well said John, the other reason a Defender is preferable to some as a passenger vehicle is its pragmatic hose out design. The last thing I want is carpet or anything else to keep clean in a vehicle designed for adventure. It's the no fuss, no frills, simplicity of the design that I love. No matter how good a disco, or any other Land Rover is, Nothing else has the simple pragmatic functionality and pragmatic design beauty of a Defender.
Of course there is a fuel penalty for high speed runs. That would have to apply to your v8 disco too? What are your actual measured numbers?
For my 2013 2.2! 110DC the numbers look like this (Litres/100km. Measured/corrected for speedo error):
Worst: 13.78/14.50
(these numbers relate to 140kmh highway runs to Singapore)
Best: 10.27/10.81
(These numbers relate to speed limit highway runs to Singapore - 100-110kmh)
Av over 36000km: 11.91/12.53
Includes the above runs, and weekends and 4day off-road trips mostly in low range refilling from jerrycans in the jungle - all of that though outweighed by 90% of kilometers travelled being Kuala Lumpur city driving and crawling traffic jams)
Reading thru this, it's almost as though the journo is giving a back handed compliment to the Defender. Bob
2015 Land Rover Defender 110 Review | CarAdvice
And this will not sit well with some traditionalists.
Land Rover Discovery Concept Tech and Interior
The Defender review is the same old presumptuous rubbish trotted out, it could be any number of reviews over the past ten years...why bother if you're predetermined to be so trite?!
The disco preview is fascinating, I like the flat floor and durable leather, but the head up display is annoying! And I'd hate to be a cyclist riding up behind a rear opening door!!
Soon 'driving' will be a thing of the past anyway.
It's as though escaping the natural world in a high tech cocoon is now Land Rovers aim, rather than reliably enabling us to access nature in order to escape the urban cocoon!!
Sorry, but to me its the wrong priority. It won't be long before the ECU chooses the route and destination for us and we just watch it all go by on the heads up display and through the invisible bonnet. We might as well stay home in our humidicrib 'real world simulators' and watch 'nature' in 3D.
Cheers Bob. My Puma Defender is the most comfortable car I've ever driven. I'm particularly comfortable with its utilitarian nature. The only discomfort for me is the lack of Land Rover customer / service support outside metro areas, particularly after warranty / and LR Assist runs out. I'd hate to think how unsupported I'd feel if I was driving a new disco sport off the Tarmac!
...Independant LR specialists have never been more important! Here's cheers to you guys! May your numbers and services expand across this great continent.
Agree about the service support in remote areas, precisely the reason Toyotas are so popular, they can be supported anywhere in Aus.. However, when I bought my TD5 D2,I went from frightened of the technology to comfortable with going any where with it, through education, some of that education from this forum, some from overseas forums. I found there is nothing to be frightened about technology, with support, you can cope, and this forum provides very good support.
I'm comfortable with my D2 , and I think that is the secret. All talk of which vehicle is better means nothing to those that are comfortable with what they have, only the insecure feel they have to make a point. Bob