Originally Posted by
DiscoMick
Because its no longer the work of the original artist. Also, it may not be restored properly. If its not done right, then the original is ruined. Is it worth the risk? Sounds like the Mr Bean movie where he ruins the original priceless painting and substitutes a print, hoping no-one will notice.
I guess its like the argument about whether vehicles should be restored or just maintained. Some restorations make the object better than the original. That's OK to some people, but to others its no longer original, so they think its actually lost value. Which would you rather have - an original, maintained but battered series 1 or something which has been totally restored and is maybe better than when it left the factory? Personally, I'd rather have one which has been maintained, but not restored. Others might disagree.
Sent from my GT-P5210 using AULRO mobile app