Discretion, much better than better than social and tabloid media as an answer.
Printable View
Discretion, much better than better than social and tabloid media as an answer.
I was thinking today that it will be interesting to see what the court decides in the Uber fatality case, as the woman was on a roadway when struck, not on a pedestrian crossing. I'm not sure about American law. Is the motorist always wrong, even if the pedestrian shouldn't be there? Why didn't the vehicle brake? This case could set precedents.
Apologies for those getting emails..
For some reason the swear filter didn’t catch the offensive words I typed expecting it to turn to *****
Sorry!!!!!
instead of bumper stickers saying: "hows my driving?", it will say "hows my programming"
In news this morning the Uber car that hit the cyclist only identified it as a pedestrian one second before impact - and did not emergency brake because the emergency braking had been disabled because it was causing erratic operation!
[QUOTE=Tombie;2807452]Apologies for those getting emails..
For some reason the swear filter didn’t catch the offensive words I typed expecting it to turn to *****
Sorry!!!!![/QUOTE
Oh damn, I missed it.[bigsad]
One second is enough time for machine action, and it is quite likely that a second of emergency braking could have been enough to make it a non-fatal accident. Any comparison with a human driver though depends more on whether the human would have been better at identifying the hazard or not, rather than the reaction time. The forecast improvement in safety of autonomous vehicles has yet to be demonstrated convincingly, and this incident certainly does not help! (Although this might have more to do with Uber than the technology!)