Do they mean the train is a driverless train - ie, no driver supposed to be in it or a train that is missing the driver that should be there? I didn't think Tasrail had the money to keep the tracks parallel much less have an autonomous train system.
Printable View
Do they mean the train is a driverless train - ie, no driver supposed to be in it or a train that is missing the driver that should be there? I didn't think Tasrail had the money to keep the tracks parallel much less have an autonomous train system.
Remotely operated. Electronic monkeys are now cheaper than humans.
Driverless out-of-control train derails in Tasmania injuring two | SBS News
be interested to see the debrief on that.
Shoot out the tyres.
so a few premin question
since they had control over the train (enough control to derail it), why couldnt they just apply the brakes and bring the train to a stop normally?
Derailers are applied to the track in front of the train - don't need to be anywhere near one to do this. Most sidings and yards have derailers built into them that can be flipped up easily - usually to provide protection to track or yard workers when working on something on the rails or a bolt on unit can be applied to any part of the track if needed in an event such as this.
It's a bit of steel that bolts to one track and fits diagonally across the rail to guide the rim over to the outside edge of the rail.