Page 54 of 89 FirstFirst ... 444525354555664 ... LastLast
Results 531 to 540 of 884

Thread: Autonomous Vehicles

  1. #531
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bee utey View Post
    Yes but it's always been this way, and most people aren't able to make rational split second decisions either. So long as autonomous cars are better than the inexperienced, the stupid, the angry, the tired, the arrogant, the stoned, the drunk, the ancient, the diabetic, the suddenly deceased drivers etc, then they will be of overall benefit to road safety.
    Where is the evidence to support this statement.
    So far it's been proven autonomous vehicles are killers.
    One thing they might benefit is the life or death choices made by cyclists.

  2. #532
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,380
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by donh54 View Post
    I think they're taking a lead out of Microsoft's book. Why pay for beta testing, when you can get the public to pay you to do it?
    Of course, Windows crashing is inconvenient, your Tesla crashing due to an "undocumented feature" is a whole other story!
    What would it be like getting the equivalent of a BSOD at speed on the highway.....
    Neil
    (Really shouldn't be a...) Grumpy old fart!
    MY2013 2.2l TDCi Dual Cab Ute
    Nulla tenaci invia est via

  3. #533
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    13,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tact View Post
    What would it be like getting the equivalent of a BSOD at speed on the highway.....
    halt n catch fire
    Current Cars:
    2013 E3 Maloo, 350kw
    2008 RRS, TDV8
    1995 VS Clubsport

    Previous Cars:
    2008 ML63, V8
    2002 VY SS Ute, 300kw
    2002 Disco 2, LS1 conversion

  4. #534
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The brave new world is starting.
    The NSW Government is starting a trial of trucks communicating with traffic lights to hold on green if a truck is near.
    Pennant Hills Rd is one of the test areas.
    I wonder what the unintended consequences will be?
    Seeing you sometimes see up to 5 trucks in convoy along there , it could be a long wait to enter Pennant Hills Rd for the Burghers of the North Shore to take darling to school.
    Regards Philip A

  5. #535
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PhilipA View Post
    The brave new world is starting.
    The NSW Government is starting a trial of trucks communicating with traffic lights to hold on green if a truck is near.
    Pennant Hills Rd is one of the test areas.
    I wonder what the unintended consequences will be?
    Seeing you sometimes see up to 5 trucks in convoy along there , it could be a long wait to enter Pennant Hills Rd for the Burghers of the North Shore to take darling to school.
    Regards Philip A
    So I need to get hold of the device so I can get rid of the red lights as well

    I am sure they trialed this with ambos a good few yrs ago.

  6. #536
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    [QUOTE=bee utey;2812660]Yes but it's always been this way, and most people aren't able to make rational split second decisions either. So long as autonomous cars are better than the inexperienced, the stupid, the angry, the tired, the arrogant, the stoned, the drunk, the ancient, the diabetic, the suddenly deceased drivers etc, then they will be of overall benefit to road safety.[/QUOTE

    Regarding the benefit to road safety, I don't think people have thought this through. Say the auto-car is driving along and "sees" 2 clowns, kids, cyclists, (take your pick) in it's lane, decides to take evasive action, but the on coming lane has a school bus in it, so it swerves off the road, hits a tree killing the driver, based on minimum harm programming! I don't think people are going to pay for a car that is designed to kill them, in the interests of minimising road traffic deaths!

  7. #537
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Crafers West South Australia
    Posts
    11,732
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RANDLOVER View Post

    Regarding the benefit to road safety, I don't think people have thought this through. Say the auto-car is driving along and "sees" 2 clowns, kids, cyclists, (take your pick) in it's lane, decides to take evasive action, but the on coming lane has a school bus in it, so it swerves off the road, hits a tree killing the driver, based on minimum harm programming! I don't think people are going to pay for a car that is designed to kill them, in the interests of minimising road traffic deaths!
    I'm sure that AV programming will be customised to suit the owner of the vehicle, once it becomes popular. Anyway, swerving right off the road into a convenient tree isn't a likely solution to this problem. Driving to the conditions (like the best human drivers do) is a better survival tactic.

  8. #538
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    764
    Total Downloaded
    0
    One autonomous expert said they probably wont make complex ethical decisions, they will probably just brake hard. So expect to possibly run over the kids, etc, and get rammed up the rear by any following car.

    If you were in a scenario where you were avoiding braking, maybe even accelerating, because that would see you avoiding an accident, be prepared for the autonomous systems ramming the brakes on, and thus you have an accident.

    Similar to how ABS brakes can cause you to have an accident because it makes you take too long to stop on dirt.

  9. #539
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Crafers West South Australia
    Posts
    11,732
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rammypluge View Post
    One autonomous expert said they probably wont make complex ethical decisions, they will probably just brake hard. So expect to possibly run over the kids, etc, and get rammed up the rear by any following car.

    If you were in a scenario where you were avoiding braking, maybe even accelerating, because that would see you avoiding an accident, be prepared for the autonomous systems ramming the brakes on, and thus you have an accident.

    Similar to how ABS brakes can cause you to have an accident because it makes you take too long to stop on dirt.
    The best results for AV tech will be when they are in the majority and can communicate with each other. Human drivers will become a minority. A bit like horses and cars coexisting on the roads, soon horses were made obsolete by being too unsafe in mixed traffic.

  10. #540
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Warwick Qld
    Posts
    1,977
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Glad I'll be pushing up Sturt Desert Peas by that time!
    -----
    You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
    -----

    1999 Disco TD5 ("Bluey")
    1996 Disco 300 TDi ("Slo-Mo")
    1995 P38A 4.6 HSE ("The Limo")
    1966 No 5 Trailer (ARN 173 075) soon to be camper
    -----

Page 54 of 89 FirstFirst ... 444525354555664 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!