Anyone using Hankook Dynapro ATs? Very well priced and some good overseas reviews. Toyo Open Country ATs recently fitted by my BIL to his Triton also seem good value for money.
Sent from my GT-P5210 using AULRO mobile app
Printable View
Anyone using Hankook Dynapro ATs? Very well priced and some good overseas reviews. Toyo Open Country ATs recently fitted by my BIL to his Triton also seem good value for money.
Sent from my GT-P5210 using AULRO mobile app
Pat logic is a friend and OP asked about Mt , muddies with big gaps will mainly grip bigger rocks on which your hopefully going slower so they hit with less force, an AT or road tyre will grab more pebbles and gravel, pepper spraying underneath. As rambling boy said about the 697's, this will be at much higher speed, doing more damage to both vehicle and eardrums. To pick up nothing you need steel wheels with a smooth face.Quote:
Originally Posted by PAT303
The 255's fit well within the standard arch and only throw stuff up the side, like standard rims, on turning. Or with different Offset/spacers.
I have Hankook Dynapro MT RT03s on my Iveco and will fit them to the D90 some time very soon. Very good tyres, especially for the price.Quote:
Originally Posted by DiscoMick
Cheers
KarlB
:)
All tyres will flick stones to some degree. I noticed it at first, but over time, and after fitting rear drawers, I don't even think about it.
Land Rover seems to choose long-wearing original tyres for its vehicles, so if I were you I'd give the Contis a chance. They are a quality tyre.
The original General Grabber TRs on our Defender have now done 70,000 ks and are still in good condition considering their age. I've had MTs on a previous vehicle and the small advantage in mud was not worth the much greater noise generated and the much longer braking distances they caused.
Sent from my GT-P5210 using AULRO mobile app