Some of these new turbo fan evaporative air cons are brilliant. Last summer I replaced a 30 year old Braemer drum evaporative for a turbo/fan at my mums and she loves it. Variable speed, thermo controlled, so much more efficient than the one it replaced and excellent value for money. We get mid forties here. The main thing with evaporatives is they change the volume of air in the area they are cooling about twice per minute. If you are getting humidity quiet often there is not enough venting. If you half open an external door, let it go and it slams shut, you need more windows open to allow air out. In my line of work I get into a lot of houses and some are like a sauna, windows are open but curtains are clinging to it!
It's not the cooler, it's the operator.
The down side is on muggy days they will increase humidity, but you can turn the water off and just blow air through and that works rather well.
Also there is security issues as you have a lot of windows open.
Climbing up on the roof to service them is a pain in the butt, however the newer types are far less maintenance demanding than the older units were.
In our own house we have a ducted system (Carrier) we installed 25 years ago. It's been great, never even had it serviced, but they are far more expensive to run. They have to combat a lot of heat in the ceiling cavity so obviously that is down side compared to the wall type split systems. We have misters set up over the condenser which improves it's efficiency and it does not seem to cycle anywhere near as much when they are going.
If I were setting up again I would go with the wall type split systems and probably Mitsubishi units.
Cheers, Mick.
1974 S3 88 Holden 186.
1971 S2A 88
1971 S2A 109 6 cyl. tray back.
1964 S2A 88 "Starfire Four" engine!
1972 S3 88 x 2
1959 S2 88 ARN 111-014
1959 S2 88 ARN 111-556
1988 Perentie 110 FFR ARN 48-728 steering now KLR PAS!
REMLR 88
1969 BSA Bantam B175
Bookmarks