I was actually (sloppily) including both capacitance and inductance losses together. I have not analysed the situation to see which is the principal factor, but I suspect both are involved.
I would've thought that capacitive losses would be very high with little in the way of inductive losses.
With a HVDC cable the "capacitor" only needs to be charged once but with a HVAC cable where the conductors are closely spaced the "capacitor" gets to be charged 50 times a second or more depending on the number of phases.
Cheers,
Mark F...
Vk3KW
2002 D2 Td5 auto - current AKA The Citrus Money Pit
2000 Disco 2 Td5 Manual - dead and gone
197? Range Rover - gone
1973 SWB SIII Diesel, 1968 SWB IIA Petrol, 195? SI Petrol - all gone
Outback Campers Sturt
http://jandmf.com
I was actually (sloppily) including both capacitance and inductance losses together. I have not analysed the situation to see which is the principal factor, but I suspect both are involved.
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
A long distance point to point HVDC transmission scheme generally has lower overall investment cost and lower losses than an equivalent AC transmission scheme. HVDC conversion equipment at the terminal stations is costly, but the total DC transmission line costs over long distances are lower than AC line of the same distance. HVDC requires less conductor per unit distance than an AC line, as there is no need to support three phases and there is no skin effect.
Depending on voltage level and construction details, HVDC transmission losses are quoted as about 3.5% per 1,000 km, which are 30 – 40% less than with AC lines, at the same voltage levels. This is because direct current transfers only active power and thus causes lower losses than alternating current, which transfers both active and reactive power.
Current Cars:
2013 E3 Maloo, 350kw
2008 RRS, TDV8
1995 VS Clubsport
Previous Cars:
2008 ML63, V8
2002 VY SS Ute, 300kw
2002 Disco 2, LS1 conversion
If I'm understanding you correctly Eevo, we should be using dc power.
If I remember correctly , Nicola Tesla , shot the whole DC generating and power transmission plans to pieces in favour of AC. He made some real enemies out of it and send some investors bankrupt.
And how are you going to achieve that? Mechanically and economically? Where are you going to get the amount of copper required?
Or, are you going to use superconductors? How are you going to supply the energy for the refrigeration required? I doubt we have enough coal reserves to do that.
I suggest you read up on "skin effect" an "bundling" in relation to AC transmission networks.
All I can say is, it's 39 here today, so I hope whatever system we have keeps working. Rain would also be nice.
![]()
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks