Reply With QuoteMMM that is different. Would look better with a Rangie body.
Swaggie
Subscriber
130's rule
Moderator
MMM that is different. Would look better with a Rangie body.
2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
2003 WK Holden Statesman
Departed
2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed
Facta Non Verba
Swaggie
I dont mind that. I still reckon the freelander should of had low range from the factory. Matt
The 4wd Zone/Opposite Lock Bathurst
263 Stewart Street, Bathurst, NSW
http://www.the4wdzone.com.au/
Discounts for AULRO members, just shoot me a PM before you purchase.
ChatterBox
Sweet....
It's the Harp on the door that does it for me
Master
Nice Rims
LordRover
SupporterAs a Freelander driver - makes sense to me - Freelander wheelbase is a basically the same as a Disco/RR and the freelander's track is a couple of mm wider than a disco/rr. Engine bay is big enough for a North South engine - as said by Ace - pity the FL didn't come with low range as standard. Easily done at the design stage and a lot cheaper than the rediculous arrangement they have at present.
PS - nearly rapped off a Disco TD5 in a drag from 60k to 100k around Parliament House - the TD5 was just a spoofteenth faster - bummer. Would be quicker if I had a TD4.
Maybe next time,
.
Gazzz
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
TopicToaster
i know this chap we have raced against him in the past. Nice bloke from up north UK
it is a range rover with a freelander body on it. So it has the V8 and the rangie running gear
But these are my brothers Freelanders and these are real freelanders
my brother racer
His wifes racer
95 300 Tdi Defender 90
99 300 Tdi Defender 110
92 Discovery 200tdi
50 Series 1 80
50 Series 1 80
www.reads4x4.com
TopicToaster
SubscriberOriginally posted by Ace
I dont mind that. I still reckon the freelander should of had low range from the factory. Matt
Never a truer word spoken :wink:
Series 11A ex Air Force
1995 ES Discovery TDI
RIP 2006 Discovery 3
RIP 2004 V8 Discovery
RIP 95 Discovery TDI
RIP 1999 Freelander
RIP 1978 EX Army FFR
was most probably the same person responsible for
1. Putting the spare under the D3
2. Deciding that we all want independant suspension instead of live axles on new models
3. Letting a computer decide when to engage low range
4. Not making a V8 or auto Defender
the list can go on and on... :wink:
Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO
SubscriberNever a truer word spoken :wink:[/b][/quote]Originally posted by DiscoTDI+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(DiscoTDI)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Ace
I dont mind that. I still reckon the freelander should of had low range from the factory. Matt
Yep. If the Freelander had low range I'd probably be motoring around in one now, a lot cheaper than the Rangie.
(Bit I'd keep the Rangie :wink: )
It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".
gone
1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
1996 Discovery 1
current
1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400
Posting Permissions
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks