Thread: New England or Pacific Highway? Which do you prefer?

I prefer the Bruce Highway.

Not because it's a good road (it isn't, it's woeful)

but because it goes NORTH :!:

yeah but it sucks to come back on after a long weekend - banks up from Caboolture to Aspley :!:

Originally posted by FenianEel
Last week had to urgently get to Sin City for a funeral, so the wife and I packed a bag, and took off in the trusty Disco.

Having done this trip too many times to mention, I took the New England and did it straight through, with a couple of toilet /drink/food stops. Avg. speed for overall trip was 110kph

Returning on the Pacific Hwy on Friday with lengthier stops, avg. speed for trip was 95kph.

Consumption was terrible both ways - due to heaviness of foot on way down and stop start , high traffic and genrally dribbling along on the way back.

To me NEW ENGLAND is better scenery, better roads (condition and layout), less peelers, less traffic, more interesting. In distance it's only 40ks longer.

PACIFIC Highway is a decent freeway at start and finish, nice drive through Nthn Rivers, then 600+k's of boring driving through 2 lanes highway of trees, much more traffic, lights, lower speeds, more little towns to slow down for and worse roads.

So what are your thoughts???
If you've done both, which do you prefer?

And Why do they call it the "coast road"? It's not on the coast, you don't see the coast, and due to traffic, little towns, lights and trucks - you hardly "coast" along??

I disagree, I personally think the pacific is far better than the new england, and I have done both well over 20 times.

pacific, it's a mongrel but it's not as fiddly as the new england

drivesafe quite rightly said the unknown part is the summerland way from grafton into brisbane, largely unused, but take the lyons road north of kyogle and save another 40 ks, did kyogle to bris airport in 2 hrs 20 mins, the coastal run is becoming clogged,

(for the cost of fuel, an air ticket would may be the go, did an air run to melb last year (ex ballina) and sent the disco to melb on a freighter, was about the same as a drive and overnighters with 5 pax)


GQ

New England to BrisVegas or Sin City, 'cause I live 25km away from it. It's a bit of a hike to the coast road from here.

The New England in the car is better than the Pacific, but is bloody awsome on a bike.

Baz.

Since moving up here I have done the trip down on the pacific a number of times. When you weigh up the time versus the cost it is cheaper to fly down and hire a car.
To drive to my parents place in the eastern subs door to door is 740km, time down average 9 1/2 hrs including a half hour stop.
To fly down, pick up a car at the airport and get to the parents, under 2 hrs.
going down the new england is not an option too far from here.
But if you were to go down from qld trun off at urally to walcha then to Gloucester and onto the highway. just by taking that road you shave about 2 hours off the trip.

john