Thread: another london attack

People are quite happy to judge after 2 1/2 years of thinking in retrospect with all the information about decisions made over 16 hrs with conflicting and incomplete information.

I would Love to think that this sort if incident will never happen again But we all know that it Will.
What we really need to do is improve how we prevent these attacks and how we react and stop them when they do happen.
What we are doing now obviously isn't working.
We need to look at how other countries are dealing with this and adopt some of their methods that work.

Originally Posted by rar110

People are quite happy to judge after 2 1/2 years of thinking in retrospect with all the information about decisions made over 16 hrs with conflicting and incomplete information.

Having just spent the last 30 mins discussing this with my ex Met neighbour, I could not agree more. I wonder what the response from all the bleeding hearts would be if if it were their brother/sister/mother/you get the picture.

Obama ( you know, Peace Prize and all that ) proved that appeasement does not work, so why do people want to keep trying it?

Originally Posted by rar110

People are quite happy to judge after 2 1/2 years of thinking in retrospect with all the information about decisions made over 16 hrs with conflicting and incomplete information.

they would of had better information if they raided monis' house at 11am!
they would of discovered the bomb was fake and been about to make better decisions.

Originally Posted by Eevo

they would of had better information if they raided monis' house at 11am!
they would of discovered the bomb was fake and been about to make better decisions.

Given his overtly demonstrated issue motivated grievances, propensity for violence and psychopathology, he potentially was easily exploited by extremists with IED capability.

A search of his home would have put the prospect of an IED at 50:50 at best, not discovered or known to be a false claim. Not great odds when playing with 18 lives. Would you trust the police to put your life on red or black at a roulette game?

No question, in retrospect, the NSW police would manage this differently with learnings from the past 2 1/2 years and some new resourcing and capability. But it doesn't guarantee a different outcome.

Originally Posted by rar110

Given his overtly demonstrated issue motivated grievances, propensity for violence and psychopathology, he potentially was easily exploited by extremists with IED capability.

A search of his home would have put the prospect of an IED at 50:50 at best, not discovered or known to be a false claim. Not great odds when playing with 18 lives. Would you trust the police to put your life on red or black at a roulette game?

No question, in retrospect, the NSW police would manage this differently with learnings from the past 2 1/2 years and some new resourcing and capability. But it doesn't guarantee a different outcome.

it would of lead to more information and lead to better decision making.

these are not new learnings. they are old and already in the book.

NSW police could of done more to help prevent two innocent deaths.

Originally Posted by Eevo

they would of had better information if they raided monis' house at 11am!
they would of discovered the bomb was fake and been about to make better decisions.

However, you're stated position earlier in this thread would have not allowed them to deal with Monis' house prior to the Lindt Cafe incident. You aren't silly, Eevo, you just don't think thing through.

Originally Posted by Eevo

maybe you care to share your opinion, or are you just antagonising bob?

Antagonising Bob, no. Fed up with trolls like you, yes.