Indeed. No political will for it. Yet people wouldn't dream of boarding a 747 if the bloke flying it had just got his restricted PPL.
That's only because of lazy Governments, and people who believe that driving is a right. I applaud the decision to get your granddaughter a good course. Hopefully they will also teach her that learning does not stop once the licence is achieved and the course is over.
The school curriculum is already crowded and there are a lot of other pressure groups suggesting that their particular topic should be added.
Which of the three Rs do people think should be cut to allow extra things to be taught?
People do need to be taught, but expecting schools to make up for deficiencies in some other part of society just isn't realistic.
We had a course in high school. Year 10 I think it was.
The teacher got his accreditation as a driving instructor. We did a lot of theory. Towards the end of the year, we were driving around the local show grounds in a dual controlled car supplied by the local car dealer.
Pre-driver education we called it.
I taught at a school back in the 90s that had a driver education program aimed at children who would soon be old enough to learn to drive.
The NRMA employee responsible for driver education supported our notion that the greatest contribution schools could make to road safety was to improve the attitude of drivers.
Our course didn't try to show drivers how to drive safely. It aimed to show them why they should drive safely. They could get the skills elsewhere. We just tried to influence their attitude.
Many more accidents result from people who don't drive safely than from people who can't drive safely.
That doesn't mean that there are not people whose skills could be improved, but there are many more whose attitude needs to be improved.