What do you suppose the BOM want's to achieve by fudging the figures? As Scientists fudging figures would open them up to ridicule amongst their peers, ruin their careers and discredit their organisation.
Do the Farmers amongst us rely on the BOM or do they dismiss their information and bunk.
NASA provides a good deal of the information too. Are they also fudging the facts.
I know Mariners rely heavily on the information from these organisations.
If they are fudging the figures I want to know why and so would anyone else who sees it as pure Science.
Cheers, Billy.
Keeping it simple is complicated.
How much dangerous pollution will be created during the manufacture and recycling of all the batteries that are to be used in future transport?
That does depend rather a lot on who you get to do each step of the job. But that's true of every technological product ever, no industry is without its scandals. If the fast buck merchants get a look-in there will be dumped piles of batteries just like there are dumped piles of everything else as we speak.
Organised network shifting waste to 'dumping capital of Australia' to avoid tariffs - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Not that dead lithium batteries are particularly toxic as waste products go.
The BOM 3 month outlook was indeed changed in the last day or so. The map for August is gone (with 11 days still to go and obviously going to be wrong).
The outlook is now completely different for the next couple of months.
Climate Outlooks
DL
It was mooted long long ago, that Hydrogen would be the replacement for fossil fuels. One scientist i seem to remember suggested that they could dam tidal basins in WA for the production of Electricity to produce Hydrogen and pipe it around the country.
Bearing in mind that Hydrogen takes as much energy to produce as it delivers, would it turn out to be more energy efficient to run Internal Combustion Engines on Hydrogen?
Cheers, Billy.
Keeping it simple is complicated.
It would be more efficient to run hydrogen in fuel cells. Honda used to produce the Odessy as a fuel cell vehicle for Californian market. Now they produce the Clarity.
The fuel cell was invented many decades ago. During the Gemini missions (FEED phase of the Apollo missions) batteries weren't able to provide the energy for the length of time required for a flight to the Moon. Gemini 5 was the first of the Gemini missions to utilise the fuel cell technology in a mission that lasted eight days.
And the beauty of the fuel cell, when you run out of hydrogen, you can quickly fill the tank. Well, that has been the experience in California.
Some old news:
California Fuel Cell Partnership - Wikipedia
California Hydrogen Highway - Wikipedia
Thank you Mr Marsh. I'd let all that slip from my consciousness.
Cheers, Billy.
Keeping it simple is complicated.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks