Used to be left on for a "handle" when eating them. Pick them up by the tail end, and when the other end is safely in the gob, squeeze the end, and voila! No slippery fingers.
As for buried ones, that sounds like laziness
What is it with restaurants leaving the tails on prawns? I can never figure out why, when there are prawns in a sauce or in some kind of dish, I am expected to wrestle the tails off the things. Or am I expected to eat them, like fingernails? It's bad enough on something like a seafood platter, where the prawns are at least accessible and 'clean', but several times recently I have had something like a spaghetti marinara, where the prawns are sunk deep in the food, and have had to fiddle with the darn things and then find somewhere to put the detritus. Is there some kind of culinary doctrine that states that the tail should stay on, or have chefs got lazy?
Used to be left on for a "handle" when eating them. Pick them up by the tail end, and when the other end is safely in the gob, squeeze the end, and voila! No slippery fingers.
As for buried ones, that sounds like laziness
-----
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
-----
1999 Disco TD5 ("Bluey")
1996 Disco 300 TDi ("Slo-Mo")
1995 P38A 4.6 HSE ("The Limo")
1966 No 5 Trailer (ARN 173 075) soon to be camper
-----
Labour / Laziness, that simple. They all try to say it is a fancy way of doing the prawns, rubbish. I get leaving the tips of the tale on, but more and more are serving up the tail intact with shell.
If I want that will just go and buy an amount of whole cooked prawns.
Having said that it is a pain peeling prawns for 300 plus customers a day, same with crays. I used to detest Christmas when cooking, 300-400 crays to do, usually ending up with blue hands from the poison in the spiked and thousands of prawns for assorted dishes.
2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
2003 WK Holden Statesman
Departed
2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed
Facta Non Verba
I sort of agree but hate dried out peeled prawns and the shell helps retain the juice and flavour. As long as a hand wash bowl of water and lemon juice is available I dig in. If not I tend to try my knife shelling skills.
I always cook my crays in the shell and cut them afterwards. Had some BBQ cray tail at a restaurant last year. It was cut in half. the meat which was on the grill was over cooked, middle slightly and only the meat on the shell was perfect in my view.
Also one of my pet hates as a chef i always preferred to remove all but the last section of the tail so at least you have a handle.
MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
1998 Triumph Daytona T595
1974 VW Kombi bus
1958 Holden FC special sedan
Where possible I have seafood without sauce.....same with meat
When I have dishes where the prawns still have the tail I just eat the whole lot, adds a bit of crunch.
Don't be upset they left the tail on.......be hopeful they removed the "poo-shoot"![]()
2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
2003 WK Holden Statesman
Departed
2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed
Facta Non Verba
Shellfish cooked in the shell retains juiciness and develops a more complex flavour. Whether it's a stock or a sauce or on the grill. Prawns in the shell taste better and are also more likely to be fresh. I'd much rather peel them myself at the table.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks