Even with a flag![]()
-----
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
-----
1999 Disco TD5 ("Bluey")
1996 Disco 300 TDi ("Slo-Mo")
1995 P38A 4.6 HSE ("The Limo")
1966 No 5 Trailer (ARN 173 075) soon to be camper
-----
Even with a flag![]()
The muppet that Homestar mentioned at Bunnings, told him that 2' sticking out the back was illegal. How could they even suppose to give advice to customers if they don't know the regulations that apply? Unless the company has provided training and/or reference material, their advice is nothing more than that - unqualified advice.
-----
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
-----
1999 Disco TD5 ("Bluey")
1996 Disco 300 TDi ("Slo-Mo")
1995 P38A 4.6 HSE ("The Limo")
1966 No 5 Trailer (ARN 173 075) soon to be camper
-----
qualified or not, if something was said or suggested I would sus it out myself and make my own decision based on my knowledge.
Not Bunnings specific but when I notice somebody giving the wrong advice than I do take time and offer to point them in the right direction or suggest researching or give them the correct info......referring to them as muppets doesn't really help the world out, is something I don't do and I look at it as an opportunity to assist.
This is old. 2007. I think the law has been changed since.
https://www.google.com/url?q=https:/...Gl0q3_P9wNvN0z
If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.
Aside from his new found membership to the Jim Henderson team the Bunnings employee was in this case legally correct.
2’ Beyond the dropped tailgate of a current Hilux exceeds the current regulations in respect to that vehicle.
(I’m in now way an angel when it comes to doing this, just pointing out the statement was correct for the circumstances)
Ah, but is it a single cab, or dual cab Hilux? What year? (there were some wheelbase changes over the years). Trayback or wellside? And how far is the tailgate sticking out from the back of the tray when lowered?
The two most common wheelbases seem to be 2750mm or 3085mm. That would mean an allowable overhang from the rear axle of either 1650mm or 1851mm (using VicRoads method of 60% of wheelbase being permissible).
Unless the fellow ran a tape measure over the ute, he's simply guessing. To make a statement of illegality based merely on a guess means, in my book anyway, the fellow qualifies as a muppet.(Notice the non-capitalised spelling, so as not to upset our good friend Disco Muppet)
![]()
-----
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
-----
1999 Disco TD5 ("Bluey")
1996 Disco 300 TDi ("Slo-Mo")
1995 P38A 4.6 HSE ("The Limo")
1966 No 5 Trailer (ARN 173 075) soon to be camper
-----
The Chain of Responsibility law has changed attitudes of consignors, hasn't it. I drove and owned line haul trucks on and off from about 1960 to 1985. I had four White Road Boss in the early 80's on line haul shuttle for a major freight forwarder pulling company trailers. They always loaded legal but there were plenty of consignors who would tell you they had two tonne over and could you put it on. My answer was always that I would put on 12 tonne over but not 2. Two tonnes would not pay the fine if caught so put on enough to pay the fine. A good friend on several occasions that I witnessed would pull out of a certain meatworks with a full floor load of packaged pork plus another of hanging carcasses on the rails. I came across another old mate at Cobar one night with a load of tyres that were barely gate high. I commented that there was not much profit in that load. He grinned and said that there 20 tonnes of batteries on the floor under the tyres. This was common practice all the time I was on line haul. Should have stopped now. I hope so. We did it because the rates were so poor on many routes and we needed the money.
URSUSMAJOR
Bunnings is responsible if a numpty loads dangerously on the property because Bunnings management is responsible for safety on the site, so if anything happens on the site and someone is injured Work cover would put the cleaners through them and someone would be held responsible and fined or maybe jailed. Someone I know was fined $40k.
If an employee warned the customer who ignored the warning then liability might be reduced.
Company bosses don't like being fined or jailed because customers do stupid things.
In my work, I could be sacked if I stood on a chair, following an incident in which an employee fell off a ladder and broke his neck. The cost to the employer of that incident would have paid my mortgage.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks