Page 17 of 29 FirstFirst ... 7151617181927 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 282

Thread: Another snatch strap death

  1. #161
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by martnH View Post
    I don't know much about bolts.
    But I think

    8.8 mean 8*100n/m² *0.8

    12.9 mean 12*100n/m²*0.9

    So 12.9 bolts almost twice as strong as the factory 8.8 high tensile.

    The chassis will gradually tear before anything snap.
    A bolt in shear (a sideways force across the shank or in bolt terms, grip) isn't as strong as a bolt in tension, (clamping force) either.
    The minimum specifications are for a bolt in tension.
    It's been waaay too long, and I can't recall the numbers but Google should help.

  2. #162
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    643
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    A bolt in shear (a sideways force across the shank or in bolt terms, grip) isn't as strong as a bolt in tension, (clamping force) either.
    The minimum specifications are for a bolt in tension.
    It's been waaay too long, and I can't recall the numbers but Google should help.
    Yes you are right.

    I should have only looked at shear strength.

    Google says it usually 0.6 of its tensile strength.

    So say m20*1.5
    So the stress area 272mm²
    This makes the minimal ultimate tensile load of 332k N

    Convert this to shear load it will be 199K N

    And this mean 20 tons?
    I have one on each chassis rail so 40 tons?

    So I will need to pull 40 ton to shear both 12.9 bolts?
    Oh is my calculation correct?

  3. #163
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,380
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 350RRC View Post
    From my days doing physics and pure & applied maths : Force = Mass x Acceleration (F=MA).

    The mass of the bogged vehicle is constant.

    If you just drag or winch it out there is very little acceleration involved so there is not a lot of force involved, just enough to overcome the resistance of the bog [...]
    DL
    Thats a bit of a logic fail... what if "just enough [force needed] to overcome the resistance of the bog" is a freaking lot of force? i.e. That the stuck vehicle is not moving even with huge pull applied. (regardless of the means of applying pull)

    Yes there is little force involved when there is little stopping the bogged from moving. But this is a sliding scale continuum. e.g:
    - a vehicle on a level blue ice patch cannot get moving... the pull needed to assist involves little force. You could use a skipping rope anchored by cable ties attached to the stuck vehicle's spotlight bracket. Provided its a nice slow pull, little acceleration, using any equipment to apply pull (KERR, tow, winch).
    - at the other end of the scale though, where the stuck vehicle is theoretically "immovable", as is the winching vehicle, for the sake of the thought experiment. Huge forces can be involved regardless of equipment used (KERR, tow, winch). Even with the slowest, gentlest, slow spool in with a winch - it won't take long for the forces to build (theoretically to infinite) as the winch takes up tension. (immovable object meets irresistible force)

    All recoveries fall somewhere between the the two ends of the sliding scale described above. Regardless whether it is a snatch or winch or tow recovery.

    The differences are (just focussing on the stuck vehicle being as close as possible to the "immovable" end of the scale):
    - in a snatch recovery, it is the mass of the recovering vehicle, magnified by its acceleration, that is the mechanism to get to excessive (breaking point of something) forces. And gets to that breaking point faster than a slow winch or tow options.
    - in a winching recovery it may take longer to get to a level where the forces involved can reach breaking point of something, or self limits (clutch slippage etc)
    - in a tow recovery typically the limitations of traction available to the recovery vehicle (ground surface and tyre interface) is what will ultimately cap the level that recovery forces can reach. Typically much lower than winch or snatch. Of course a gutless towing vehicle will further lower the level of force that can be reached - but assuming the tow vehicle is powerful enough, its where the rubber meets the road/gravel that caps forces on the tow equipment.
    Neil
    (Really shouldn't be a...) Grumpy old fart!
    MY2013 2.2l TDCi Dual Cab Ute
    Nulla tenaci invia est via

  4. #164
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by martnH View Post
    Yes you are right.

    I should have only looked at shear strength.

    Google says it usually 0.6 of its tensile strength.

    So say m20*1.5
    So the stress area 272mm²
    This makes the minimal ultimate tensile load of 332k N

    Convert this to shear load it will be 199K N

    And this mean 20 tons?
    I have one on each chassis rail so 40 tons?

    So I will need to pull 40 ton to shear both 12.9 bolts?
    Oh is my calculation correct?
    Cool, I had in my head 2/3 but it's been far too long since I've been involved in that stuff.

  5. #165
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,380
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by trout1105 View Post
    I agree that these factory towing points are NOT Recovery points and would doubtfully withstand the forces involved in a "Snatch" recovery.
    However they are designed to enable the vehicle to be "Towed" So using this as an anchor point when doing a double line pull with a pulley block/snatch block is acceptable as far as I am concerned.
    Where there is bugger all rolling resistance, on road for example - I agree.

    however - If the vehicle is stuck such that rolling resistance is substantially increased. No thank you.
    Neil
    (Really shouldn't be a...) Grumpy old fart!
    MY2013 2.2l TDCi Dual Cab Ute
    Nulla tenaci invia est via

  6. #166
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,380
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by trout1105 View Post
    [...].
    Remember you are not trying to Lift 3T of vehicle off the ground you are dragging it along the ground So 6T of force isn't usually necessary.
    Tombie hit the nail on the head (when he mentioned a sticky bog and hung up on a rock...).

    You are ignoring that, depending on what is impeding the stuck vehicle (see previous post up a few from here - sliding scale), the force needed to recover the stuck vehicle may well exceed the force needed to lift a vehicle off the ground vertically.
    Neil
    (Really shouldn't be a...) Grumpy old fart!
    MY2013 2.2l TDCi Dual Cab Ute
    Nulla tenaci invia est via

  7. #167
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Geraldton WA
    Posts
    8,284
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tact View Post
    Tombie hit the nail on the head (when he mentioned a sticky bog and hung up on a rock...).

    You are ignoring that, depending on what is impeding the stuck vehicle (see previous post up a few from here - sliding scale), the force needed to recover the stuck vehicle may well exceed the force needed to lift a vehicle off the ground vertically.
    If the vehicle is that badly bogged/hung up then a 12,000lb winch won't be able to pull you out and won't be able to impart enough pull to destroy the towing point anyway.
    Seriously guys if there is a rock or anything else stopping a recovery you would either remove the offending item or jack the vehicle off it, Simply using maxtracks/treads under each wheel will "Lift" the vehicle up and out of the bog or you could even go "Old School" and do the spare wheel trick to lift the truck whilst winching
    Honestly if you have to use 6T of pull to recover a D2 then it is time to re think your recovery method.
    You only get one shot at life, Aim well

    2004 D2 "S" V8 auto, with a few Mods gone
    2007 79 Series Landcruiser V8 Ute, With a few Mods.
    4.6m Quintrex boat
    20' Jayco Expanda caravan gone

  8. #168
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,380
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by trout1105 View Post
    If the vehicle is that badly bogged/hung up then a 12,000lb winch won't be able to pull you out and won't be able to impart enough pull to destroy the towing point anyway.
    Seriously guys if there is a rock or anything else stopping a recovery you would either remove the offending item or jack the vehicle off it, Simply using maxtracks/treads under each wheel will "Lift" the vehicle up and out of the bog or you could even go "Old School" and do the spare wheel trick to lift the truck whilst winching
    Honestly if you have to use 6T of pull to recover a D2 then it is time to re think your recovery method.
    Fair enough - if you are no longer bring hypotheticals into the mix (comments like “remember you are not trying to lift a 3T vehicle in the air) then theoretically correct comments like “a stuck vehicle may require way more effort than a simple dead lift” can also be parked.

    You quite reasonably span across the hypothetical/theoretical gulf when you suggest that if a stuck vehicle is that badly stuck, and requires that much force to extract - then a rethink of the recovery methodology is needed.

    Sadly, my own observation is that such sensible thinking often doesn’t occur in recovery situations until after the power smoke starts leaking out of electric winches, motor vehicle clutches, etc. Then only someone might twig that it’s time to do a bit of thinking and manual labour.
    Neil
    (Really shouldn't be a...) Grumpy old fart!
    MY2013 2.2l TDCi Dual Cab Ute
    Nulla tenaci invia est via

  9. #169
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    764
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In the situation where a person with a winch and tow points is deciding whether to recover a bogged vehicle that has tow points, only a single line pull is likely to be sensible, in which case the tow point of the recovery vehicle does not come into question.

    If the bogged vehicle has a recovery point you can use, and a double line pull is deemed necessary, then it becomes a matter of judgement to not overload the recovery vehicle's tow point. I think by this time you are out of the realms of most recoveries and into the realm of a serious recovery needing careful thought. Maybe the line of pull can be improved to reduce the loads involved. Maybe the hook can be taken to a sling around a tree instead.

    [My current vehicle has 'semi' recovery points at the front, it has a winch bar with mounts designed to take bow shackles, so although i am confident its not fully properly rated, i know it has been designed for the task.]

  10. #170
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    764
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Cool, I had in my head 2/3 but it's been far too long since I've been involved in that stuff.
    All things fail in shear, but when a bolt is loaded under tension it will fail in a cone shape, so the shear area is larger than if it fails under pure shear. The larger shear area of the cone means more force is required.

    However, is the bolt actually under pure shear? Can you rule out any element of bending load?

Page 17 of 29 FirstFirst ... 7151617181927 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!