Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Free Wheeling Hubs

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Irymple, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,902
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Free Wheeling Hubs

    Were series Land Rovers sold with free wheeling hubs fitted?
    There seems to be a vast majority of series Landy's about with FWH's fitted and it makes me wonder if they were fitted by dealers as standard kit, as an option if requested by the prospective buyer, or by the owners after purchase.

    Cheers, Mick.
    1974 S3 88 Holden 186.
    1971 S2A 88
    1971 S2A 109 6 cyl. tray back.
    1964 S2A 88 "Starfire Four" engine!
    1972 S3 88 x 2
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-014
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-556
    1988 Perentie 110 FFR ARN 48-728 steering now KLR PAS!
    REMLR 88
    1969 BSA Bantam B175

  2. #2
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,515
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Free wheel hubs were unheard of for perhaps the first ten years of Series production. They gradually appeared (in this country anyway) in the 1960s, and tended to be pushed by dealers, as they made more money from selling extras. As far as I know, they were never actually fitted by the manufacturer, although they did appear in the optional equipment lists and hence in owner manuals by Series 3 production.

    I can't think of any fleet owners who used them, certainly not the Australian Army or SMHEA as examples.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Yarrawonga, Vic
    Posts
    6,568
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ive always considered FWH to be a total con job & marketing excersise by aftermarket, the damage done to railkos , diffs , UJ's & propshaft splines far outweigh their usefulness . Damage done by not occasionally locking them and thus providing lubrication to moving parts & the prop shaft spline moving without rotating & thus wearing unevenly, the top half of the diff crown wheel rusting from condensation, etc.

    I even considered any perceived Fuel savings to be placebo effect.

    However , I now have a series LandRover that is powered 100% by electricity & any efficiency gains can be measured & much more obvious than from an inefficient petrol engine (by comparison)

    So I pondered the issue & machined out a flogged set of drive flanges & fitted up front so that there was no spline . DIY FWH if you like, but unlockable) The performance gain is immediate , Less noise , less vibration, & easily 10% more battery range per charge, So I Eat my words, & apologies to those that I spruked my vehement opposition to FWH use in the past.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bruthen, Eastern Vic.
    Posts
    842
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by goingbush View Post
    Ive always considered FWH to be a total con job & marketing excersise by aftermarket, the damage done to railkos , diffs , UJ's & propshaft splines far outweigh their usefulness . Damage done by not occasionally locking them and thus providing lubrication to moving parts & the prop shaft spline moving without rotating & thus wearing unevenly, the top half of the diff crown wheel rusting from condensation, etc.

    I even considered any perceived Fuel savings to be placebo effect.

    However , I now have a series LandRover that is powered 100% by electricity & any efficiency gains can be measured & much more obvious than from an inefficient petrol engine (by comparison)

    So I pondered the issue & machined out a flogged set of drive flanges & fitted up front so that there was no spline . DIY FWH if you like, but unlockable) The performance gain is immediate , Less noise , less vibration, & easily 10% more battery range per charge, So I Eat my words, & apologies to those that I spruked my vehement opposition to FWH use in the past.
    Pretty handy when you have a worn front driveshaft spline. Stops it shaking the car apart on the highway.
    But yes you have to remember to engage them regularly.
    I know, I should replace the shaft. One day.......
    Terry
    80 109" 2.6 P ex Army GS, saved from the scrappie.
    95 300tdi 130 Single cab tray.
    2010 Guzzi 750

  5. #5
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,515
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by goingbush View Post
    Ive always considered FWH to be a total con job & marketing excersise by aftermarket, the damage done to railkos , diffs , UJ's & propshaft splines far outweigh their usefulness . Damage done by not occasionally locking them and thus providing lubrication to moving parts & the prop shaft spline moving without rotating & thus wearing unevenly, the top half of the diff crown wheel rusting from condensation, etc.

    I even considered any perceived Fuel savings to be placebo effect.

    However , I now have a series LandRover that is powered 100% by electricity & any efficiency gains can be measured & much more obvious than from an inefficient petrol engine (by comparison)

    So I pondered the issue & machined out a flogged set of drive flanges & fitted up front so that there was no spline . DIY FWH if you like, but unlockable) The performance gain is immediate , Less noise , less vibration, & easily 10% more battery range per charge, So I Eat my words, & apologies to those that I spruked my vehement opposition to FWH use in the past.
    Interesting! I tried to measure difference in fuel consumption, but as you know, there are so many variables that it is hard to come up with figures you can be sure mean anything. A lot of the variables still apply to your electric vehicle (wind, temperature, tyre pressure, driving style differences etc) so an extended test would be necessary to confirm the difference. You would also have to ensure that there is no non-standard drag in the front drive chain, such as excess bearing preload or a bent axle housing etc.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Yarrawonga, Vic
    Posts
    6,568
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    Interesting! I tried to measure difference in fuel consumption, but as you know, there are so many variables that it is hard to come up with figures you can be sure mean anything. A lot of the variables still apply to your electric vehicle (wind, temperature, tyre pressure, driving style differences etc) so an extended test would be necessary to confirm the difference. You would also have to ensure that there is no non-standard drag in the front drive chain, such as excess bearing preload or a bent axle housing etc.
    John, very true, as you say I could have a dicky front end, but it does feel nice and free when I turn the prop by hand. To substantiate my findings I'd have to substitute the front axle with another unit.

    So yes, I am basing my findings on empirical data only relevant to my vehicle, I can directly view a display readout of my Power consumption and current being used rather than just bum in seat, For $1000 I can buy a data logging display that outputs a graph of various data , sort of like a inbuilt dyno, but thats would have to take a fair chunk of realestate of the series dash, I'll stick with the little 3.5" Zeva BMS screen is not so obvious (when its off)

    When I switch to Eco Mode the current draw is limited in programming to not exceed 150Amps & at full throttle . Without FWH maximum Eco Mode speed in top gear is usually about 70kmh , ( dependant on wind , road surface etc ) , a couple of runs today with my DIY unlocked hubs 75kmh -80 kmh in Eco mode full throttle on the same section of highway.

    On the basis of that Ive taken a punt & ordered some AVM 24spline hubs, which I'll need to do some machine work on to make fit as the half shaft setup is different on a Lightweight.

    the BMS display


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    643
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by goingbush View Post
    John, very true, as you say I could have a dicky front end, but it does feel nice and free when I turn the prop by hand. To substantiate my findings I'd have to substitute the front axle with another unit.

    So yes, I am basing my findings on empirical data only relevant to my vehicle, I can directly view a display readout of my Power consumption and current being used rather than just bum in seat, For $1000 I can buy a data logging display that outputs a graph of various data , sort of like a inbuilt dyno, but thats would have to take a fair chunk of realestate of the series dash, I'll stick with the little 3.5" Zeva BMS screen is not so obvious (when its off)

    When I switch to Eco Mode the current draw is limited in programming to not exceed 150Amps & at full throttle . Without FWH maximum Eco Mode speed in top gear is usually about 70kmh , ( dependant on wind , road surface etc ) , a couple of runs today with my DIY unlocked hubs 75kmh -80 kmh in Eco mode full throttle on the same section of highway.

    On the basis of that Ive taken a punt & ordered some AVM 24spline hubs, which I'll need to do some machine work on to make fit as the half shaft setup is different on a Lightweight.

    the BMS display

    Maybe a diesel engine won't mind the additional dragging of a connected axle?

    I think engine characteristics plays a role here

  8. #8
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,515
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Good point. The electric drive system is not going to vary significantly in efficiency over a very wide range of power settings. But a diesel, and even more, a petrol engine, varies quite widely in efficiency for even small variations in power settings, and these changes in efficiency may well mask small gains in drive train efficiency when looking at fuel consumption.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Yarrawonga, Vic
    Posts
    6,568
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Martin & John , you guys hit the nail on the Head .

    Ive never noticed any difference with FWH before & any gains really were placebo effect , because the inefficiencies of the Internal Combustion & masked the FWH benefits.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Geraldton WA
    Posts
    8,284
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have had FWH on many of my 4WD's and haven't had any problems with them whatsoever.
    As I often go down to the beach or launch a boat the hubs tend to get used often, Maybe that's the secret
    You only get one shot at life, Aim well

    2004 D2 "S" V8 auto, with a few Mods gone
    2007 79 Series Landcruiser V8 Ute, With a few Mods.
    4.6m Quintrex boat
    20' Jayco Expanda caravan gone

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!