Yes John, I understand that, but remember too that the cotton farmers or irrigation farmers would probably be a better description, would be helping to fund/pay for it through they’re water rights etc.
Another option would be I guess proper channeling from high rainfall areas. Be it piped or a channel, or a combination of both, depending on terrain, I guess it would be a cheaper option.
Personnally, I think they should be charged an arm and a leg to get water to them anyway. If you need THAT much water to grow something, then why should they be collectively allowed to destroy basically an ecosystem and not pay for an alternative solution?.
One way or another it needs fixing.
I’m sure whatever the extra costs are, we, as the consumer will end up paying for it anyway.

