Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 54 of 54

Thread: How Reliable Is Land Rover Now?

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Surf Coast
    Posts
    1,014
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Without knowing what the terms of reference for the survey are, i.e. what questions were asked, it's hard to come to any hard conclusions.
    I notice the graphs are labelled as dependability results, not reliability.
    Having answered a few of these and also having had to interpret the results of similar types of surveys, the best way to think of these is a representation of customer satisfaction, rather than anything truly hard and fast about how good any individual car or brand is.
    For example customer expectations play a massive part. Look at how high Skoda is in the UK results compared to VW, Seat and Audi. In many respects these could be results from almost the same car, yet the Audi buyer, having paid a damn sight more than the Skoda buyer, has way higher expectations.
    So if the same niggly fault occurs in each brand, who is gonna be more ****ed off? And who is gonna expect the dealer to fix it NOW, as opposed to the buyer who, having lower expectations, is happy to wait till it goes for its next service?

    Looking at the position of LR in each of their graphs, how much of that is down to crappy dealers?
    Dan

    '14 Def 110
    '75 Lightweight
    '98 300Tdi Disco (gone)
    '80 2Dr Rangie Classic (gone)

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Narre Warren South
    Posts
    6,798
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blackrangie View Post
    Hmm if your were not referring to the new defender in your original comment, you could have fooled me
    The thread started off asking 'how reliable is Land Rover now' not how reliable is the new 'Defender'.
    Long term testing should make a vehicle more reliable but isn't a 'given' as you've suggested in several threads about the new 'Defender'.

    I hope that the new 'Defender' is successful for Land Rover but it's aimed at a very different market to the original Defender.
    The company has gone through several different owners, is now manufacturing vehicles outside the UK and serving a very different market.
    Under Tata management the company has grown and the whole range has moved upmarket which is more than BMW or Ford ever achieved.

    The hype around the new 'Defender' intrigues me, but as stated before I'm not in their target market for a number of reasons. It is interesting though sitting on the sidelines and seeing the excitement in some people the hype is creating......


    Colin
    '56 Series 1 with homemade welder
    '65 Series IIa Dormobile
    '70 SIIa GS
    '76 SIII 88" (Isuzu C240)
    '81 SIII FFR
    '95 Defender Tanami
    Motorcycles :-
    Vincent Rapide, Panther M100, Norton BIG4, Electra & Navigator, Matchless G80C, Suzuki SV650

  3. #53
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gromit View Post
    The thread started off asking 'how reliable is Land Rover now' not how reliable is the new 'Defender'.
    Long term testing should make a vehicle more reliable but isn't a 'given' as you've suggested in several threads about the new 'Defender'.

    I hope that the new 'Defender' is successful for Land Rover but it's aimed at a very different market to the original Defender.
    The company has gone through several different owners, is now manufacturing vehicles outside the UK and serving a very different market.
    Under Tata management the company has grown and the whole range has moved upmarket which is more than BMW or Ford ever achieved.

    The hype around the new 'Defender' intrigues me, but as stated before I'm not in their target market for a number of reasons. It is interesting though sitting on the sidelines and seeing the excitement in some people the hype is creating......


    Colin
    All in good fun

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,744
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've always had a issue with those JD power surveys - The important thing for reliability to me is how many issues/problems stop the car dead and require a tow truck to get fixed, or at best require an unscheduled trip to the dealer/mechanic. Anything that can wait until the next service is not really an issue. JD power doesn't really tell me that info (not as far as Im aware anyway)
    5yr warranty is just a marketing excise and has nothing to do with manufacturers faith in their vehicles - lets look at a handful of other manufactures that are still offering 3yr warranties - LR, BMW, MB, Audi and Jaguar. I would put up the argument that people who buy these brands would not typically be buying the generic cars that offer 5yr warranties (or at least not buying them for the same purpose as a more upmarket vehicle)

    Strictly speaking about reliability in general of all machines and not just cars - your most likely to have a breakdown/failure during a machines infancy or totally randomly throughout its life. So if a car doesn't fail in its first year then chances are good that it will be fine for the next 3 or 5 years either way.

    AgeofReliabilityCurves-1024x828.jpg
    Shane
    2005 D3 TDV6 loaded to the brim with 4 kids!
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/members-rides/220914-too-many-defender-write-ups-here-time-d3.html

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!