Neither Chevai nor Tiffany look a day older, so it's not just black & white or sepia, Des. [bigwhistle]Quote:
Originally Posted by superquag
Printable View
Neither Chevai nor Tiffany look a day older, so it's not just black & white or sepia, Des. [bigwhistle]Quote:
Originally Posted by superquag
Quote:
Well Done !
Superquag,
(long) Retired
Photo-Engraver, Process Camera & Klischograph Operator, Colour dot Etcher,
- Photo-Lithographer, > Pre-Press Technician ...... = kept fiddling Job Description as Tech. advanced.
Thats all very well, but do you know how to use a Baby Brownie? SQ......." A WHAT?"[bigrolf]
One wonders who thought that name up as it has connotations of soiled Baby Napkins full of ****?
Quote:
Neither Chevai nor Tiffany look a day older, so it's not just black & white or sepia, Des.
Well it wouldn't be they are in colour.[biggrin]
Thankyou :) I'll have to post how it looked before!Quote:
Originally Posted by superquag
What a weird name indeed [emoji23] Do they work where you cover the hole after opening it for so long to expose the film? I love old film cameras but remember at school a box camera that film paper was put in and im sure we had to hold hands over the little hole that let light in. I just cannot remember exactly how thoughQuote:
Originally Posted by 4bee
Little Baby here.... Uses the smaller, '127' FILM... light-sensitive dry emulsion on transparent "plastic" base, in a roll..
YouTube
Mummy / Daddy Brownie, uses '120' film, larger, 6x6cm image, wider FILM. - still in use today, if you know where to get it.- For us die-hard Luddites ! 12 or 20 shot rolls. Another format that uses this film stock is 4.5 x 6cm.
YouTube
And this is really old... GLASS plates.
YouTube
Properly stored, Olden-Days film negatives and paper prints can last for hundreds of years. Not so sure about a (cheap Chinese or expensive Chinese...) memory card or CD / DVD disc in 100 years.
YouTube
Analogue film & printing is... well, very satisfying. - It's the old story, - The Journey is as important as the Destination. a process not a push(button)
Yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by 4bee
And an 'Empire Baby 127' and a 120 plastic thing...the name of which must not be mentioned....Speed Graphic (NO, you can't buy the flash-gun and make a Star Wars light sabre !) ...and 5x4 studio camera ([bighmmm]) and Twin lens reflexes, SLR's in both 35mm and 6x6 - Bronica & KIEV
AND KLIMSCH 24x20" (60 x 50cm film) and similar format ESKOFOT, and deriviatives....
Hint:_ Got very thin....WHITE hair. Product of being born middle of previous Century... [biggrin][biggrin][biggrin]
The Kodak range of Brownies, Baby, Box & prob others I've never heard of ie. Super Brownie, Ultra Supa Brownie, Mega Supa Brownie, Mega Ultra Supa Brownie etc , were a quite simple camera
It could have been a Box Brownie where you needed to deflect ambient light so you could see the image in the B&W view finder. A cupped hand usually did the trick. This may be the one you are thinking of?
The Baby Brownie (1935) had a sort of a spring loaded pop up viewfinder, a bit like a a rifle back sight & you aligned the proposed view through that from memory, & aligned the openings of the two inner metal frames.
It was much smaller Camera, constructed of Bakelite , which cracked very easily & thus were not very robust, which produced tiny images when developed.
Have one here in a cupboard now which belongs to 'er indoors & it was one of these given to her for her 10th Birthday during her time in Mogadishu, East Africa.
It has an Antelope Skin outer cover & strap. WOT? Haven't they all?[bigrolf]
Ian appears to have had connections with Kodak Brownies through his Dad.
They were the bees Knees at the time & I recall every young kid in the street wanted to acquire one, Box (1901) was first choice & the Baby was the next choice, always assuming one had a choice back then & that they were available.
Not sure of the Box's construction but I think it could have been tin plate covered with Black material glued on.
Film was a 620 (?) I think. No idea why 620 it certainly wouldn't have been 620 mm or inches. Maybe the length of the film roll?
Used properly the 620 could take some great images. No hi-speed stuff though due to the lag of the mechanical shutter mechanism & the fillum type & then one had to roll the film on manually to the next position for the next shot. Things started to improve when a 35mm camera became available Colour snaps? you betcha. And the rest as they say, is History. Digital was unheard of, least to my ears, & look how far that has gone.
My youngest brother works with digital printing.
This pic was a scrappy looking Black and White print he enhanced.
It was taken around '57 or '58.
That was the latest model in those days[bighmmm]
https://www1.picturepush.com/photo/a...0/16273149.jpg
IMHO he did a good job. Nice & clear, balanced, interest, Colour Gradient of the murky water....... 11/10 in my book.
Then again, this is a Personal opinion not a Professional one, for I am but a humble Fridgie, not Baron or a Cecil Beaton. [bighmmm]
Once a Fridgie always a Fridgie.
[smilebigeye]
Baron (photographer) - Wikipedia
Had the best day out with my horse today [emoji7] loving the new wheelchair [emoji7][emoji7][emoji7] https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...50f31db8eb.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...78608178a8.jpg