Originally Posted by 
Saitch
				
			 
			But, isn't that the crux of indigenous mythology? If the actual reason for something's existence was not understood , then a good yarn was made up to explain things e.g. the Glass House Mountains. They're volcanic plugs, not Mum, Dad and a cowardly little boy. 
Then there's the Coloured Sands story : Minerals, not a rainbow serpent v magic boomerang, the two sisters teardrop marks at Gantheaume Pt. near Broome : Dinosaur prints not tears, and so on. 
These are nice stories but should they take precedence over the facts?
One 'Dreamtime Story' I remember was about the creation of the moon, caused by an old black fella throwing a shining boomerang into the sky so his people could see at night. No harm with the story but how would it have gone down with NASA if a complaint had been put in about the 1st moon landing?
I'm not saying that these, or any creed or culture's beliefs and myths, should be denigrated but surely, common sense, even though in short supply apparently, should prevail in the struggle of Fact v Fiction..................and there are no greater purveyors of 'Fear and Ignorance' than the 'God Above' establishments.