
Originally Posted by
prelude
They have all become unafordable (down here anyway) and all ride on air suspension, which most people write off as not bush worthy. I'm hoping it is since I plan to take my P38 far and about

but yeah. They all do look alike and personally I do not believe there is much soul left in them.
-P
Despite being a well thought out and worthy upgrade from the Classic, I agree that the P38 just lacked something intangible. I could never quite put my finger on it. The Series Landrovers were full of character and the Classics had, literally, layers and layers of technology added on over the decades until it couldn't take any more. But, gee, they just felt like home. The P38 was efficient, comfortable, did everything well, was good in the bush and quite straightforward to work on, particularly the EAS. But it was never somehow "your" car.
But I genuinely love the D4. It is actually a progression from the P38 in functionality and can be readily modified with aftermarket stuff for touring, towing or expedition requirements so that you can tailor it like a bespoke suit. So, I would argue the D4 does have that elusive quality of character.
2013 D4 expedition equipped
1966 Army workshop trailer
(previously SII 2.25 swb, SIII 2.25 swb & lwb, P38 Vogue, 1993 LSE 3.9V8 then HS2.8)
Bookmarks