
Originally Posted by
ChookD2
AFM and BFM have been around for a while now. I have worked under BFM and it certainly gave me some additional flexibility in my day to day hours. I didn't have to do 14 hours in a given 24 hour period but the options was there and most days I took it. And I think that is how it should be, a driver decision not a company decision on what hours you complete in one day. It only takes an accident or some other unforeseen incident to mess up your day.
The only company that I know that went down the path of AFM was Simon, and part of the obligation was to have their entire fleet speed limited to 90km/h. Along with the additional administrative burden and stricter compliance issues this is why most companies only go down the BFM route. BFM also requires addition training for drivers and accreditation to implement but not quite as restrictive as AFM.
The other downside to this is that the average age of the long distance truck driver is climbing and if not in the low 50's is certainly in the high 40's. Most younger drivers only want to do local and short haul work. Then you get the drivers from...ummm.. overseas....... many of who (from my experience) should not have a heavy vehicle licence.
And then there are the consignors and consignees that want the job done in the shortest possible time (usually last minute) and at the cheapest price. These are the people the government should be targeting.
That explains the Ron Finemore Woolworths trucks that create traffic chaos on the Barton highway during peak hour, limited to 90 and with an endless stream of idiots trailing them who feel the need to get past with limited overtaking opportunities. And I thought it was just because they were tightarses finding a way to save fuel.
Regards,
Tote
Go home, your igloo is on fire....
2014 Chile Red L494 RRS Autobiography Supercharged
MY2016 Aintree Green Defender 130 Cab Chassis
1957 Series 1 107 ute - In pieces
1974 F250 Highboy - Very rusty project
Assorted Falcons and Jeeps.....
Bookmarks