
Originally Posted by
edddo
How about go 25 front , -25 rears.
Or 20 front , -20 rears......close enough.
Then one of each for the 2 spares
Remember that the real issue is legality.
The plus/minus 25 or 20 idea either way is at least legal, so won't affect insurance.
The track widening will cost approx $6K or so, and if done, uprated axles done at the same time would make sense as well.
79's are notorious for breaking rear axles(in some situations). And from what I understand of the issue is that it usually breaks close to the diff, so if not removed will subsequently destroy the diff too.
My mechanic has spoken about it(axle breakages), and then having found Ronny Dahl and his love for the 79 series was funny to watch him talk about the same issue.
The other thing RD mentions about a 'faulty' design on the engine side is the bad location of the alternator, being very low down.
If you have the knowhow, the track widening can be done as a DIY kit which would save a bundle in labour at least.
By the time you factor in a set of wheels, (what, maybe $2k nowadays .. unless you go for steelies) .. I reckon the 'shed load more' that it will cost for the axle widening would be the better option.
Of course the major factor here would be the total budget you have in mind.
Personally, if you only intend to tow say up to 2t one of the 'regular' dual cabs would be a bit more ideal. Lower fuel use, easier to drive as a daily(or more accurately around shopping areas) .. etc.
Arthur.
All these discos are giving me a heart attack!
'99 D1 300Tdi Auto ( now sold :( )
'03 D2 Td5 Auto
'03 D2a Td5 Auto
Bookmarks