Printable View
As soon as the Feds pass a law banning States closing their borders related to a specific circumstance then Fed law overrides State Law - the Constitution allows States to make emergency laws but the Constitution it is not specific on all circumstances - as soon as a Fed law is in place the State law is kaput.
The recent High Court case was not on border closures but on other sort of related aspects but not directly on the topic.
As said things have changed .
Haven't gone near it since induction day when the tablet of stone was hurled at me from that general direction... :whistling:Quote:
Originally Posted by V8Ian
YES vax rates are changing in an upward curve, Which is a Good thing[thumbsupbig]Quote:
Originally Posted by V8Ian
Indeed Judges are Not medical experts So they have Zero qualifications to decide which expert is the most expert.
No they are not medical experts but they are experts on the law and determine the credibility of the evidence and information presented to them by the experts as it applies to the Law.Quote:
Originally Posted by trout1105
No............... they have to decide if the law is being adhered to in border closure cases.Quote:
Originally Posted by V8Ian
DL
NoQuote:
Originally Posted by trout1105
They’re figures. Not driven by facts at all.
Totally unconnected / related.
Extra $$$ - Mining royalties from a boom early in the pandemic
Court challenge? The government of WA controls
Both upper and lower so no challenge. It also dictated new laws under assumed power and this has prevented challenge. Other states have not taken such approach.
If it hadn’t been for mining Golum would have sent the state broke with his hard line stance.
His archaic stance to other things isn’t good either.
Just heard.... Israeli govt spokesman rabbiting on about ultimately needing SEVEN jabs / boosters.
Australia apparantly has sufficient on hand / on order to do the same.
Reckon we're not being told something ?
Speaking of hidden gems, anyone heard what it going to replace our "gold standard, PCR" ? (Dec. 31) - Seems it quietly turned to lead..., back in July.
Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing
EDIT: - Apologies to a Certain Gentleman who's name I inadverdantly used above.... Just spotted the faux pas.... Now corrected.
Remember being told that pericarditis / myocarditis is extremely rare side effect of the jabs ?
Well, there's a new Medicare number for getting an MRI. - to assist in diagnosing a "rare" condition.
MBS online - Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for myocarditis associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccination
Curious as to why it's only valid for 6 months., or am I reading that incorrectly. ?
The way I read it, it just means that a person possibly with the rare side effect, where other testing is inconclusive, can have access to an MRI to aid diagnosis at government expense.Quote:
Originally Posted by superquag
Can only be used once for that patient for that diagnosis use to stop it being used for multiple MRI's on that person for other reasons. (rorting)
That is all. DL
Also known as a simple KPI.Quote:
Originally Posted by superquag
When someone isn’t feeling well and has had a Covid jab it would be easy to test and log to this KPI.
Then results tie in for recording purposes.