OuchQuote:
Originally Posted by DEFENDERZOOK
I see what you mean
Printable View
OuchQuote:
Originally Posted by DEFENDERZOOK
I see what you mean
so......youve managed to stop laughing i see......
When you stop laughing you are dead..still hereQuote:
Originally Posted by DEFENDERZOOK
The UK study was heating up at work today. I missed most of the posts as they were removed. I found one to respont to though. Told him his dream on all 4WD's being banned from the city was fine as long as all non 4WD's are banned from outside the city.
As for Laws I don't even like him in the adds.
There was an article in last Saturday's Sydney Morning Herald which said that Laws was irrelevant...
Cheers, GQ
He is a biased :censored: and what he says will always reflect a position that usually is financially advantageous for him. Enough said.
I could not agree more.Quote:
Originally Posted by gruntfuttock
Never trust a "jurno". Just look at the trouble he got himself into over the cash for comment bank fisco. Which was a great thing as he lost alot of credibility over that.
I know nothing about that as I was out of the country at that time.Quote:
Originally Posted by ak
i think you can sum up John Laws as a
"comment
uttering
nonsense
talker"
anyone disagree?
yep could not agree more