Yep. A is the answer.
Sure as eggs that piece of junk doesn't meet ISO 17025.![]()
If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
Yep. A is the answer.
If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.
Hello All,
According to Bob Welds and his dog, "Sparky" - who is "pointer" from Weldnotes.com - the answer would be A. This is because the horizontal measurement is 13.50 MM and the thimble vertical measurement is 0.13 of a MM. This equals 13.63 MM
Accessed 12th November 2021 from, How to Read a Metric Micrometer by WeldNotes.com - YouTube
My apologies for finding an animated video of a bloke and his dog explaining micrometer reading. The inaccuracy of the half a MM marking on the bottom scale of first post's diagram does not aid easy interpretation. I fixed the bottom horizontal scale up a bit so it appears more to scale. See below.
We are having a thunderstorm here. Snowy my 110 Defender that I am working on is parked outside without any cover. I am at a little bit of a loose end at the moment. Yep - it's still raining...
Kind regards
Lionel
As stated, we are all assuming it’s a micrometer.
And from my experience with micrometers, the intervals at the bottom would be the .5mm increments.
From my experience, diagrams are not always accurate or too scale.
I don’t know how the answer could be 26.98mm, maybe I should have stayed a couple more years at school
Gav
1985 110 Dual Cab 4.6 R380 ARB Lockers (currently NIS due to roof kissing road)
1985 110 Station Wagon 3.5 LT85 (unmolested blank canvas)
It’s a rubbish micrometer,belongs in the nearest bin.
But if you ignore the lower graduations,and presume it zeros on each of the top graduations,it’s D.
Trick question - answer is:
E/ 11.6543 cubits
S
'95 130 dual cab fender (gone to a better universe)
'10 130 dual cab fender (getting to know it's neurons)
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks