
Originally Posted by
Saitch
I had a drive of a CX in the late 80's. A mate of mine worked at the Citroen dealership at Bowen Hills, in Brissie.
I remember being somewhat suitably impressed by the vehicle! Not that I gave it a workout or anything!


Most people couldn't drive them.
I think the dealers used to say "take it for a few days for a test drive" .... as people couldnt' just jump in and drive them easily. think along the lines of:
--brakes ... there is a pedal, but all it does is press on a hydraulic valve. Stamp on it like everyone would and you better hope there was no-one following close behind. Absolutely fabulous and extremely powerful once you learn to caress them with your big toe ..
--people couldn't steer the things
--the indicators didn't cancel
--you have to crawl into the car thats sitting on its belly and wait for it to lift.
--smog pumps and "semi-automatics" made it a dog of a thing until it all fell off. The importers were importing a model that was a manual gearbox, but with a torque converter. So you had to change gears even though there was no clutch ( I used to think they were dumb and tear them out to fit a proper manual. These days I think they just add to the appeal of the things).
back then you had local cars with 4 turns lock to lock of the steering wheel.... even cars with power steering had lots of turns .... and here's the CX in 1975 .... with diravi steering. There is no mechanical connection between the steering wheel and front wheels while the motor is running as its fully powered hydraulic steering. Its 2.5 turns lock to lock ... self centers strongly, and will center if you let go of the steering wheel. At parking speeds its light as a feather, at speed its heavy.
These days poeple are much happier to drive them as nearly all cars have direct power steering so the difference isn't great. Rose coloured glasses aside, they are a a fabulous old car ... but they are still an old car, with normal "old car" type issues. ie: the ventilation is terrible, the A/C is garbage (and was when the cars were new). They rusted just like most cars of there era, the interiors melt and disintegrate in our sun etc....
We never got the petrol turbo cars here like this one. For there time they were quick'ish for a European car ( 0-100 in 7.5 -> 8.5seconds depending on who you want to believe... personally I think there was a big variation in the wastegate adjustments that would explain the differences listed all over the place). A quick fiddle with the wastegate will get you around 200hp with no other changes... but all you'll do is smoke the clutch, so I've never touched mine. there is little effort in getting upto 250hp with the tuning companies in the UK. but I've never really seen the point. These hp figure sound pathetic in this day and age, but cars were light back then... a full sized family sedan was about 1250kgs.... and being a turbo'd petrol motor there is huge torque ( ~ 300Nm from the factory).
They are more of a high speed cruiser. er, "I've heard"
they feel much the same cruising at 220km/h as they do at 110k/h .... only the trees and white lines blur past much more quickly.
Proper cars--
'92 Range Rover 3.8V8 ... 5spd manual
'85 Series II CX2500 GTi Turbo I :burnrubber:
'63 ID19 x 2 :wheelchair:
'72 DS21 ie 5spd pallas
Modern Junk:
'07 Poogoe 407 HDi 6spd manual :zzz:
'11 Poogoe RCZ HDI 6spd manual
Bookmarks