Shhh we might [bigwhistle] Just kidding!
My dad is a Nasho.
Printable View
A couple of years ago I was attempting to internet a documentary maker I know that it was now or never to put their stories down and make a series about it
The public see just those who went to Vietnam their experiences were much more varied and wider than that
When they are gone so are the details of where and what was happening and how they responded to it
What I love about our local member, is that when he takes the time to chat to various local members who have served or he researches their stories and then during the services such as VVD and NSD services he then tells us all about their particular story. Its actually really really cool. He's been the minister for veterans affairs and defence personnel, but he is genuinely really into what he does and each persons story.
I had to register, but callup was deferred as I was at university. When I finished in 1962 it depended on your birth date, and I was balloted out. So I missed out on National Service.
I know of two 'Regular Army', Viet Nam vets. One is 76 and the other is 80ish.
I think the number of the intake must have restarted - I am almost 81, and i would have done national service if I had not gone to university. But I think it was reshaped for the Vietnam War a few years later, and that is probably when the numbers started for the intake.
I just checked Wikipedia. Conscription in Australia started in 1909, but was only for home defence. Attempts to broaden it for overseas service during WW1 failed, and it ended in 1929. Reintroduced with compulsory training for unmarried men in 1939, it became conscription for 18-35 and single men 35-45 in 1942, but again mostly only on Australian territory. This seems to have ended in 1946.
In 1951 conscription was introduced for all males 18 or over. This was the scheme I had to register under. It was ended in 1959, while I was still at university.
Conscription was reintroduced in 1964, when the use of conscripts overseas was also legalised, nding in 1972.
I was in the local sub-branch the other night having a countery with my 90yo father in law.
he has had a lot to with the sub-branch previously so still knew a lot of faces.
I was shocked and stunned at the general appearance and physical condition of many of these vietnam vets , and had to ask him who they were , as I had previously known most of them , just did not recognise who they were.
I'm approaching 70yo and most of the old diggers were 75-78 , and I could not help thinking how sorry they looked and can only assume it is because of their service in Vietnam that they are like this.
I am enjoying such good general health and vitality and they are not.
This is what the gucci suited non military experienced DVA representatives should be seeing....the RSL is about the only place where the old diggers can can go where they are understood.
btw I served 8yrs including 2 active tours to Malaysia and I will be ramping up my activity in the sub-branch from now on.
I think that by the time they get to retirement age the apparent age of people depends to a very large extent on their life experience. And life experience can be bad both in and out of the army.
I first became aware of this when I attended a high school 50th class reunion. Everyone there would have been within a year of 67, yet anyone looking at them would have put the age range from late thirties to mid nineties. The only Vietnam veteran I have regular contact with (that I know of) is about 70, and looks mid sixties. On the other hand, my brother-in-law, who served through most of WW2 (as a volunteer) looked ten years older than he was when he died at 83 - but I attribute that mostly to the smoking that the army introduced him to!