Originally Posted by
V8Ian
There were some horror stories, post 2011 Brisbane floods, with some insurance companies arguing that any sort of water ingress was flooding, ergo unless the property was specifically covered for flood, claim declined.
There was a woman on a Current Affairs type programme whose roof was damaged during a storm. Her insurance accepted liability for the roof replacement, but refused any subsequent water damage claim, as she had no flood cover.
Typical insurance company behaviour, willing to take the money, they twist words looking for any way to accept liability on a product bought in good faith.