Quote:
Originally Posted by tombraider
The bar is legal fittment for P38, However there is a completely different set of standards should you talk D1 D2 or D3. Very expensive process of ADR compliance with that sort of SRS system. For me that is.
Even some vehicles that do not have SRS there could be a possible arguement that a bull bar may contribute to injury to the occupants in an accident where the vehicle is designed with crumple zones such as the D1 and many other vehicles. I believe there is areas such as SRS that have been over dramitised by large companies to protect there own sales. I don't believe that The large bull bar manufacturers have crashed a vehicle for every new bar they produce. The data used is for 1 single crash test or at most several. If this ADR was to be tested in a court after an accident causing injury or death than maybe we would have some real standards. And I would then engineer bars to suit other vehicles. Lets face it most air bags are not armed to 60klmh or more, way past where a crumple zone or crush can is of any real use in some thing as stong as a 4WD. It all does not add up for me. No doubt there is someone smarter than me on the forum who can explain this better or has another opinion.
And no offence taken. gives me chance to place a new debate about SRS and ADR. This ADR seems to be a mates rates sort of thing. I only build gear for rovers, so to costly for me to start Building bars for other SRS systems. I do have 2 new defender bars under construction they will be like the P38 bar something very differant. I must admit this bar I am proud of, lots of work in the design and can never be mass produced or made to fit anything other than a Rover.
glen
