You'd think in 2007 the sexy tail lights would be flush mounted instead of utilising trailor lights, this would not only look better but would have a practical application in that they wouldn't get smashed as easily in a 4wd or minor traffic bingle.
Can someone explain the obsession with appearance for a utility vehicle? For a start, "restyling" would involve a whole collection or new parts, most of which are likely to be damaged in a minor accident, will be unavailable second hand since they are only used for a year or two production - and for the same reason, knowing Landrover, in a few years they will be unavailable from the manufacturer either.
Probably the main attraction of the Defender is the fact that it does NOT change unnecessarily.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
You'd think in 2007 the sexy tail lights would be flush mounted instead of utilising trailor lights, this would not only look better but would have a practical application in that they wouldn't get smashed as easily in a 4wd or minor traffic bingle.
Those off-road pics look as though they were taken at Eastnor Castle.![]()
M
Same comment - requires unnecessarily changing parts - in this case the rear side panel, the rear panel, the steel body capping, and the light (replacing it with one that while it might be slightly less vulnerable would cost ten times as much to replace, and you would only be able to get the whole light not the glass). All the parts you are proposing to change are the same or at least interchangeable for the last twenty years or more. The sensible thing would be to fit protectors similar to the army's fittings on the Series Landrovers, preferably as standard.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
Definitley a big improvement inside with some familiar switches and positions there so people don't get lost. Bonnet bulge interesting, wonder what prompted that, v6tdi perhaps?
Not owning a Defender myself, are the doors different too? These look to be one piece.
All Civilian Defenders (and the 110/90 since about 1985) have had doors with windup windows - and all doors with windup windows have been one piece. The Defender doors currently used were introduced in 1987, with a pressed steel frame rather than the earlier built up frame. As far as I can tell from the photos, these are the same in the new model.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
Disco 4 SDV6 Auto
Disco 4 SDV8 Dual Cab Project
Disco 2 M57 Extra Cab Project
Foton Tunland Cummins ISF
Disco 1 3 door 4.6 V8 Auto
RRC V8 Auto "Classic" Softdash
RRC 300 TDI Auto
Disco 1 TD5 Auto Buggy
Disco 1 300 Tdi Auto Ute
SAME Explorer 70HP 4x4 Tractor plus Nell Loader
Subaru GDA WRX
Triumph Bonneville SE
Yamaha TTR250
G'day Folks![]()
I agree with what JDNSW has posted, the whole concept of a utility vehicle is it's practicalityit shares a basic body style of it's precedesors and that replacement parts and panels are basically interchangeable, this is a major factor with O/seas Aid agencies, as the cost factor is a large part of their budget concerns, these vehicles are not built as a Fashion Item but a Working vehicle, style changes by other manufacturers is only driven by the need for sales and to keep the production lines and stylists in work
You can fit a lamp, Clutch M/cyl from a Series 3 straight into a TD 5 defender, even the Throwout bearing is interchangeable 1971-2006, Headlights from 51-06,
try to do that with a Nippon built one they don't even carry parts past 10 years.
They are my thoughts anyway.
cheers
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks