Copied directly from
wikipedia.
"Contrary to popular belief, coal power actually results in more radioactive waste being released into the environment than nuclear power"
"Nuclear generation does not directly produce sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury or other pollutants associated with the combustion of fossil fuels (pollution from fossil fuels is blamed for many deaths each year in the U.S. alone). It also does not directly produce carbon dioxide, which has led some environmentalists to advocate increased reliance on nuclear energy as a means to reduce greenhouse gas emissions."
"Even at three mile island, the most severe civilian nuclear accident in the non-Soviet world, the reactor vessel and containment building were never breached, even though it had suffered a core meltdown, so that very little radiation (well below natural background radiation levels) was released into the environment"
There are many other facts in there that dispel the myths surrounding nuclear energy. As I said before, go have a read
If the basis of the arguement has turned to "nuclear is more expensive", tough. Something has to be done.
On a personal note, thanks grumybastard for raising this issue, it has been most educational.