Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 48

Thread: So is this what the disco was based on originally

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    i wonder if the inside smelt like onions!!! and when you hit the horn it do you think it went like this

    he haw he haw.......he haw

    and personly that picture i feel should be sensored there are children on this forum

    dullbird
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide - Torrens Park
    Posts
    7,291
    Total Downloaded
    0
    IIRC , it was only 2WD and the rear roof and side sections were plastic.

  3. #23
    mcrover Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoTDI View Post

    If the Disco was based on that then the designer was blind because that is an awful looking car no matter what way you look at it.

    Maybe he passed one on the motorway while broken down and in that brief flash the idea came to him but that is even a stretch.

  4. #24
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,713
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    I think that there the Discovery bears quite a resemblance to this eyesore.

    I was looking at my Disco in the car park across from work this arvo and I thought, "It isn't a well balanced design. It looks wrong from some angles."

    I think the D1 is too tall in relation to it's width. Certainly, I think the RR classic and the P38A are far nicer designs. There's nowt much better than a really good late model classic - they look just right.

    I'll give it one thing, though - the turning circle seems better than the P38A - I can get into parking spaces more easily. (Even the P38A isn't as bad as a County or Defender 110 ).

    Ron
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Barmera .SA.
    Posts
    1,841
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by p38arover View Post

    I'll give it one thing, though - the turning circle seems better than the P38A - I can get into parking spaces more easily. (Even the P38A isn't as bad as a County or Defender 110 ).

    Ron
    Ron, I thought my 79 LWB F100 had turning circle problems, till I got the S3. Now I have to do a 3 point turn to get into my shed. At least the Landy starts every time I want to go somewhere. Bloody high performance &%# Fords.

    Shorty.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Kalgoorlie WA
    Posts
    5,546
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My father had a Simca Aronde when I was about 5. We lived in Wollongong then. He lost it somewhere near Bulli Pass - slid under a semi that was jack-knifed across the road. The semi had "TNT" written in big red letters on the side. In those days, Thomas Nationwide Transport was only a fairly new company and not many (including the old man had ever heard of them). The old man worked in the mining industry and had only ever heard of one meaning for "TNT" - he tells me he **** himself just before the Simca went under the trailer.
    Cheers .........

    BMKAL


  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Tregeagle, NSW
    Posts
    2,406
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I don't know it looks like a practical body shape, for what I don't know.
    it looks a bit more aerodynamic than a defender

    ( i say this as i hide under the table avoiding the defender rock throwers)
    i remember seeing something about simcas years ago, maybe it was a sticker on a car,or the adds for them
    went something like this, 'Some Car this Simca'
    well that describes this thing.
    its different.

    john

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Forty minutes closer to the hills in a house the bank is kind enough to let me live in
    Posts
    1,532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I wonder if anyone was ever conceived in one of those things?

    That would be the ultimate test of whether it is REALLY that ugly.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Alstonville...is near Byron Bay
    Posts
    3,034
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's design doesn't really worry me - kinda cute in an odd way....

    There have been far worse designs than this effort; remember the Triumph Mayflower, the 120Y, that 70s Caddy sedan with its bum cut off, any of the newer (but mostly unseen in Aussie) Ssangyongs...

    Apparently there are people out there who don't like the Discovery3, heretics.....


    GQ

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ringwood, Vic
    Posts
    153
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Wortho View Post
    That reminds me of the AU Falcon in that it is just as ugly. I think they said in their ad's for the AU that it was a two year design process, if that is so you'd think that at some point someone would have actually looked at it and said "Hey hang on fellas stop everything, this thing is BUTT UGLY" I wonder if that happened with this monstrosity, are the French embarressed as a nation, they should be.
    I know someone who worked for Ford QA at the time and all the market reveiws they did with prospective buyers (previous new Ford buyers) came back saying the car was butt UGLY . The designers convinced the execs that the design was ground breaking and Ford Aus could lead the market.
    How wrong can you be

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!