Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: AULRO hard to use

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    1,655
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mcrover View Post
    Thats like a blast from the past, I was using a commodore 64 the last time I saw a message board like that.
    Yeah, I just went and had a look to see what all the fuss was about - reminded me of the dial-up BBS's of the late 1980's crossed with Google Groups! Why on earth would anyone run a forum like that these days when vBulletin costs peanuts.

    Of all the BBS's I'm on, I think every one of them uses vBulletin except one, which uses phpBB.
    Jeff

    1994 300TDi Defender
    2010 TDV8 RRS

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba
    Posts
    6,151
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hmmm, I went and had a nosy, and Im not sure if the thread is referring to that site or here. If it was in reference to hear, then ummmm, heellloooo, I spent 5 mins there and couldnt wait to get off, its all over the place, hard to follow, not specific, have to click in and out of messages etc, not professional or easy by any means. Each to their own I guess,

    Regards

    Stevo

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maryborough QLD
    Posts
    4,322
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As said before, it was a great site and forum 5 years ago, plen ty going on and informative.

    But times have changed, forums have become so much more user-friendly, the front web site is no longer functional and AULRO has really taken the people who used to frequent that site (like me and many others) because it was antiquated and boring to be quite honest

    Live on AULRO

    Trav

  4. #24
    mcrover Guest
    Yeah, I was hoping I wasnt going to upset anyone by saying that.

    Back about 20 years ago it would have been state of the art and I dont understand how anyone could say that this is harder to navigate than in there.

    Maybe the people who stayed are still running the old 80086 machines and 12k modems with 5 1/4 floppy drives or maybe even audio tapes.

    It would be so hard catching up with windows and ADSL connections that they have these days. I cant talk, im still on dial up at home

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Clifton Springs, Vic.
    Posts
    841
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mcrover View Post
    Yeah, I was hoping I wasnt going to upset anyone by saying that.

    Back about 20 years ago it would have been state of the art and I dont understand how anyone could say that this is harder to navigate than in there.

    Maybe the people who stayed are still running the old 80086 machines and 12k modems with 5 1/4 floppy drives or maybe even audio tapes.

    It would be so hard catching up with windows and ADSL connections that they have these days. I cant talk, im still on dial up at home
    8086???

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Alstonville...is near Byron Bay
    Posts
    3,034
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yeah well...

    it's really hard to access the internet with a typewriter

    GQ

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Toowoomba, Queensland
    Posts
    1,863
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Quiggers View Post
    Yeah well...

    it's really hard to access the internet with a typewriter

    GQ
    Are you an Apple 1 fan, GQ? I thought you might at least have updated to a Mac Classic.
    Steve

    2003 Discovery 2a
    In better care:
    1992 Defender
    1963 Series IIa Ambulance
    1977 Series III Ex-Army
    1988 County V8
    1981 V8 Series 3 "Stage 1"
    REMLR No. 215

  8. #28
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,539
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by kaa45 View Post
    8086???
    From memory the 8086 was one of the first 16 bit Intel microprocessors; the 8088 used in the first IBM PC was a cut down version using an 8-bit external bus. They were superseded by the 80286, 80386, 80486 and the Pentium. The 8086 was not used to anything like the extent of the 8088 or its successors, but the whole family is backward compatible with the 8086, so that is the name used to refer to the family of processors.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Alstonville...is near Byron Bay
    Posts
    3,034
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scrambler View Post
    Are you an Apple 1 fan, GQ? I thought you might at least have updated to a Mac Classic.

    Geez scrambler, I was referring to them, not me......

    go and fix a patient

    btw: whats the temp up there, this morning? we're getting very cold west winds....

    GQ

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    1,655
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    From memory the 8086 was one of the first 16 bit Intel microprocessors; the 8088 used in the first IBM PC was a cut down version using an 8-bit external bus. They were superseded by the 80286, 80386, 80486 and the Pentium. The 8086 was not used to anything like the extent of the 8088 or its successors, but the whole family is backward compatible with the 8086, so that is the name used to refer to the family of processors.

    John
    Actually, I think the 8086 was the 8 bit one (Running at a speedy 3MHz or so in the first IBM XT's), and the first true 16bit was the 80286.
    Jeff

    1994 300TDi Defender
    2010 TDV8 RRS

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!