Don't you have the soft copy of the original letter on your PC? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigE
Or did you write it! :eek:
Ron
Printable View
Don't you have the soft copy of the original letter on your PC? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigE
Or did you write it! :eek:
Ron
Ron,
It was via email from work. Will not be back on site for another 2 weeks. Any way hopefully this scan will work.
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/im...2007/07/75.jpg
I 'd be upset at the editors remark.
Theres no reason to do that unless its tit for tat about the incorrect info.
obviously doesn't NEED LR owners to buy the mag.
I have taken no offence to the eds remarks. Seem to be pretty tongue in cheek to me. We all say that sort of stuff about our own LRs. I take it as a bit of a compliment when he says its saved them doing a used review. At least this mag is giving LR's a fair go (well maybe except Roothy). There have been some really good LR features lately. The miss information comes from journos who do not completely research their info and this happens in most mags. This mag has 4 LR vehicles in their stable at the moment as well and they are doing up an early Rangie from scratch as a feature.
At the end of the day my Defender has been to the dealer once in 4 years since I have had it (some minor stuff done myself), my mates 100 series that is only 4 years old has ben in at least 15 times and is coming up for clutch no 3.