Thread: Should Prisons Seperate Ofenders or all in one zone

what , if anything,, has this to do with Landrovers????

not much really, just think of it as a chat around a camp fire....

or in the kitchen,

since the Dawg's been doing some stirring lately!



(I must be tired)

The thing about giving crims tv, radio, newspapers etc is that they are a very good management tools that means alot to them when you take them off them.In a certain remand centre there a hell of a lot of inocent people who have been stitched up by coppers or have been in the wrong place with the wrong people and have to wait up to 2 years to go to trial, also it has been proven that people can be stitched up using DNA there are some pretty shady people in there I know it's hard to believe

yeah back to England would be good, or that place New Zealand maybe

Its the minor offenders that should be segregated not the real crims. Keep the relativally low level crims away from the serious, so they do not become harder crims.

They have to segregate them because they have a duty of care. They would, oh what a pity, be minced meat in general circulation and because that is a known factor they have to be protected.... It's just pathetic they don't consider the life long trauma these maggots have inflicted on their victims.

I reckon they can be chucked in the bin and play 'the Momma and the Pappa' all night long

A lot of the so called petty criminals start of coming thru juvenile justice which is a joke it is like a holiday home and they can get away with everything and are not held responsible for their actions they all have a real attitude problem and when they come into big jail they ***** themselves.If they really want to drop crime they should adopt the broken windows principle,as they say 80% of the crime is commited by 20% of the people