Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 46

Thread: What a Spud!!!!!!!!!!!

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nanny state UK...
    Posts
    3,253
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by sclarke View Post
    I think Mark is spot on.

    You can cover big distances in a defender, OK not like a 100 series.
    BUT
    the 100 series is crap in the bush compared to the Defender.

    We are all forgetting what a Defender is. Its a 4wd designed for its sole purpose to be the BEST 4wd built for 4wding, not touring. The Defender is just a run on of the Series.... and that was a Tool and not a sedan.
    If you want to tour in a nice comphy 4wd that is still capable then you buy a Disco or Rangie.

    Clarkie
    Exactly that...

    Garry, I still stand by what I said. As you correctly say, I do have 1st hand experience of the distances you guys have to cover but no matter what car you choose, there is always going to be an element of compromise. My 300TDi 110 was more than capable while in Oz... I was running at 3500Kg for most of the time and would still happily cruise past most things on the road.

    There’s another aspect to the larger engines that we haven’t covered here and that’s the fuel economy. If you stick a larger engine in the Defender, it’s going to consume more fuel. In turn that means you have to fit larger tanks, carry more weight and therefore you end up either reducing the range or reducing the payload capacity.

    It doesn’t need a larger engine... It’s a tool, not a fashion accessory.

    M

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Box Hill, Victoria
    Posts
    100
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's been interesting reading all of this after we've just bought a 96 300tdi fender and driven it home from Adelaide on the weekend. These criticisms of lack of power and speed just don't gel with what we've experienced so far.

    Now, this is not a perfect example of a defender (as my mechanic's bill now testifies!), but even then it sat on 110 without the slightest problem, and in fact had to be watched as it kept creeping up to 120. And then coming up the hills out of Bacchus Marsh it sat in 5th gear and just pulled up those hills without hesitating. I've never done that before!

    Sure, I wasn't exactly trying to overtake anything quickly, but then I didn't need to.

    And that was all done, Adelaide to Melbourne, on 3/4 tank! One happy camper so far!

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sunny Pucka
    Posts
    3,138
    Total Downloaded
    0
    All I know is Sallyanne will pull... I've hooked up a Leopard Tank by A-frame to prove this point. Sallyanne pulled it, trying to turn it was interesting but she did it.

    My main point is why have a car, 4X4 capable of going at high speed if the law will only alow so much. Even the NT has a 130kph limit now.

    Easo

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    755
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Now that was good lunchtime entertainment.

    More kW and Nm never goes astray but you will pay for it in fuel. Whatever you have you just got to drive it to it's capability. No sense in pulling out to pass a B-Double with on coming traffic if you know you haven't got the grunt to get past with an adequate safety margin.

    My 2.7 lt TDV6 might not be a big V8 grunter but she'll return 9.5lt/100km on the Ade-Melb run fully loaded which is pretty good in my mind.

    Chris

  5. #35
    tombraider Guest
    Hahaha

    What a great laugh!!!

    No-one used the WRX argument!!!

    204ps max limit in Japan...
    V8 Killer......

    Power isnt always the way!!!

    450hp/18 gears/22000kg...... Truck style
    Gearing makes it happen.....

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by camel_landy View Post
    Exactly that...

    Garry, I still stand by what I said. As you correctly say, I do have 1st hand experience of the distances you guys have to cover but no matter what car you choose, there is always going to be an element of compromise. My 300TDi 110 was more than capable while in Oz... I was running at 3500Kg for most of the time and would still happily cruise past most things on the road.

    There’s another aspect to the larger engines that we haven’t covered here and that’s the fuel economy. If you stick a larger engine in the Defender, it’s going to consume more fuel. In turn that means you have to fit larger tanks, carry more weight and therefore you end up either reducing the range or reducing the payload capacity.

    It doesn’t need a larger engine... It’s a tool, not a fashion accessory.

    M
    Mark,

    But tell me you wouldn't have preferred something like the TDV6 in the new Defender - come on you can tell me

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Alstonville...is near Byron Bay
    Posts
    3,034
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Watcha whining about?

    Some bloke drove a 2 seat 'smart' around Aussie a while ago and lived to write a story about his adventures....

    GQ

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Singapore via Melbourne
    Posts
    1,938
    Total Downloaded
    0
    define 'enough' horsepower, torque, highway speed etc etc etc... - this of course varies from user to user, but for me the defender (new or old) hits the spot.

    I'd much rather drive a light truck (coz that's what the defender is) on the road than a family car (pretty much all other 4x4's). light trucks are not family cars and vice versa.

    depends on how you weight the following factors (if you ask me):

    1, on road manners
    2, SWMBO friendly
    3, Accessories (aircon, satnav, other electrickery)
    4, touring range
    5, off road manners
    6, load/towing capacity

    if you answered numbers in ascending order of importance, choose any disco
    if you answered numbers in descending order of importance, choose a defender

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nanny state UK...
    Posts
    3,253
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    Mark,

    But tell me you wouldn't have preferred something like the TDV6 in the new Defender - come on you can tell me

    Garry
    To be very honest... No.

    I've driven Defenders, with large engines, off-road and they just become difficult to control. The slightest touch of the throttle just causes massive amounts of wheel spin.

    I also tend to find that the larger engines don't have as much engine breaking so it then becomes 'interesting' on the big drops.

    M

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    3,424
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hey Mark,

    Did you drive the LR mock up of the D110 with the TDV6?
    Disco 4 SDV6 Auto
    Disco 4 SDV8 Dual Cab Project
    Disco 2 M57 Extra Cab Project
    Foton Tunland Cummins ISF
    Disco 1 3 door 4.6 V8 Auto
    RRC V8 Auto "Classic" Softdash
    RRC 300 TDI Auto
    Disco 1 TD5 Auto Buggy
    Disco 1 300 Tdi Auto Ute
    SAME Explorer 70HP 4x4 Tractor plus Nell Loader
    Subaru GDA WRX
    Triumph Bonneville SE
    Yamaha TTR250





Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!