Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Retirement Funding - How much $ is enough?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in the wild New England, NSW
    Posts
    4,918
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Retirement Funding - How much $ is enough?

    There is a nearby thread on incomes that has prompted me to throw this in...

    We have our own super fund and have retired (because we needed to healthwise) on its proceeds and I could never get, and I still havn't got, a useful answer to this question

    "how much do we need to retire?"

    The answer from "advisers" seems predicated on handing the funds over to them and then they will pay us about 7% (bank interest) and keep the rest

    The accountant's smarta#se answer was always "if you have to ask you havn't got enough" - an answer common to the finance industry I gather and in fact the most annoying, frustrating and useless answer I can think of.

    The accountant said we should keep working (I wonder if that was as much to his benefit as ours)

    The tax treatment since 1 July means that the income from the fund is tax free (for over 60s) and the income from the fund's investments is also tax free and imputed tax on investments is repaid to the fund by the tax office

    Given that the stockmarket is growing at at least 20%pa (yes I know we can't count on to always do that but it has done for quite a few years now), it is possible to do projections of fund growth less pension pays so it shouldn't be too hard to give e$timates I would have thought.

    I didn't want to divert that other income thread. I noticed quite a few sensible posts on it so I would appreciate any opinions on this matter

    If the consensus is a lot higher than we have then we'll have to learn to survive on the govt pensions with part-time work I guess

    thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Singapore via Melbourne
    Posts
    1,938
    Total Downloaded
    0
    my parents still work for wages about 10 weeks a year - it puts em right up to the tax free threshold and doesn't impact all the tax free perks pensioners get... they intend to do this as long as they can physically manage it - no retirement age for university examination invigilators

    that said, how long is a piece of string? - if you are debt free (and you should be if you are retired!) then your costs should be relatively low, if you have alternate sources of income (eg rent out the spare room, mow lawns for cash, make something to sell at markets) then you should be fine and not need to worry too much - relying on the proceeds of managed funds to pay the bills would have me worried though! what happens when they go backwards? (they will someday soon!) you can't eat nothing can ya?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in the wild New England, NSW
    Posts
    4,918
    Total Downloaded
    0
    yes, EchiDna, you're quite right in saying its like asking how long is a piece of string

    I should have written too that I was assuming the no debts bit...

    but I guess I'm loooking for general opinion/views like $150k may well not be enough but maybe $250k could be, or $350k, or $450k or whatever...

    what prompted me to write was it is that no-one who should know seems to want give a straight answer - even in ballpark amounts

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Singapore via Melbourne
    Posts
    1,938
    Total Downloaded
    0
    thats coz we all live to a different age and die spending a wide range of $$$ on medical bills in the process!

    ideally we would all die with $0.25 in the bank and have retained all our assets so that we can hand something on to the next generation... but that is rarely the case

    I'm budgeting on dying at the average age of about 85 quitely in the night while never having had a thing go wrong in my life medically (by the time I get there it might be 100 - who knows)...

    impossible to be accurate as we are all different, but chances are your accountant is right and there is no such thing as enough to be certain it's enough!

  5. #5
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,529
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Unfortunately it does vary dramatically between individual circumstances, including how you want to live.

    The biggest uncertainty is how long you are going to live. The thing we would all like to do is to keep the capital and just live on the interest/growth. But this, for any realistic life expectancy, means a lot bigger sum of money than would otherwise be needed, and leaves your heirs with a big windfall.

    Then there are unexpected expenses - for example, in my case we had to pay for oxygen for nearly two years for my wife (no subsidy if you don't have a pension), and a lot of travel for medical treatment. The treatment for her itself did not cost much - most was bulk billed or charged at the scheduled fee. But a recent cancer operation I had, and an earlier foot operation had staggering "gap" charges, despite private health insurance (main advantage of this was no waiting list).

    Other expenses include having to help adult children financially or in ways that involve costing you money even if not actually paying it out directly to or for them. (Weddings, home purchase, emergency bailouts etc.)

    But remembering all these variables, my view, after 13 years as a self funded retiree is that a minimum is probably round $500,000, but again I have to emphasis that it all depends on circumstances.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ferntree Gully VIC
    Posts
    10,362
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    Unfortunately it does vary dramatically between individual circumstances, including how you want to live.

    The biggest uncertainty is how long you are going to live. The thing we would all like to do is to keep the capital and just live on the interest/growth. But this, for any realistic life expectancy, means a lot bigger sum of money than would otherwise be needed, and leaves your heirs with a big windfall.

    Then there are unexpected expenses - for example, in my case we had to pay for oxygen for nearly two years for my wife (no subsidy if you don't have a pension), and a lot of travel for medical treatment. The treatment for her itself did not cost much - most was bulk billed or charged at the scheduled fee. But a recent cancer operation I had, and an earlier foot operation had staggering "gap" charges, despite private health insurance (main advantage of this was no waiting list).

    Other expenses include having to help adult children financially or in ways that involve costing you money even if not actually paying it out directly to or for them. (Weddings, home purchase, emergency bailouts etc.)

    But remembering all these variables, my view, after 13 years as a self funded retiree is that a minimum is probably round $500,000, but again I have to emphasis that it all depends on circumstances.

    John
    thanks John i'm really looking forward to retirement now
    4 kids and all them added pressures

    i think i might need a couple of mill to retire on
    130's rule

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As another self-funded retiree, my principal income is from two allocated pensions. These are balanced funds that have earned around 14% last last 3 years. I am drawing the minimum permitted from these and the balance is going up in spite of drawing an income. I also receive a Superannuation Fund pension which is indexed at CPI six monthly. This fund did not give a pension increase last June as they say there was no CPI rise, "no inflation", in spite of the Reserve Bank saying there is 6% inflation. This fund also earned at 14% but does not pass the earnings on to the members saying the returns are to build up the fund for the bad years. If you do not wish to claim an Age Pension from Centrelink then I would say you need around $500,000 in allocated pensions to produce an income of $40,000 pa based on retiring at 55 and a life expectancy of late eighties. As the asset value of the allocated pensions declines with withdrawals then you would become eleigible for an Age Pension.
    URSUSMAJOR

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland (Australia)
    Posts
    1,461
    Total Downloaded
    0
    After me having to give up working at 48 due to illness we have been looking at this issue very intensely.

    It's not until you get $0 from anywhere and the bills keep arriving that many people realise how income dependent we are driven as a society.

    Our solution, stop looking at advertising that only wants our money and give us goodies we don't need.

    Look at the reoccurring expenses like electricity, phone, Internet, rego, etc. For an example we saved $20 per month just by changing Internet providers and now have double the speed that we used to.

    Limit take away meals as these can add up to over $100 per week easily just for the convenience of a quick feed.

    As well as the above do a detailed budget to see exactly where money is going. Make sure to include holidays as these are needed.

    Another idea is to either reduce liquid assets enough to get pension benefits or have enough not to need a pension. e.g. some people buy an expensive house as their place of residence so not to have cash assets for CentreLink purposes.

    Certainly not an easy exercise and be careful of financial 'experts' as they get thousands for signing you up to a investment plan. Our financial adviser lives very well on 3 days per week work and he is under 40 years of age. Lucky for us that he is a family friend and takes minimal commission from us.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland (Australia)
    Posts
    1,461
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm View Post
    As another self-funded retiree, my principal income is from two allocated pensions. These are balanced funds that have earned around 14% last last 3 years. I am drawing the minimum permitted from these and the balance is going up in spite of drawing an income. I also receive a Superannuation Fund pension which is indexed at CPI six monthly. This fund did not give a pension increase last June as they say there was no CPI rise, "no inflation", in spite of the Reserve Bank saying there is 6% inflation. This fund also earned at 14% but does not pass the earnings on to the members saying the returns are to build up the fund for the bad years. If you do not wish to claim an Age Pension from Centrelink then I would say you need around $500,000 in allocated pensions to produce an income of $40,000 pa based on retiring at 55 and a life expectancy of late eighties. As the asset value of the allocated pensions declines with withdrawals then you would become eleigible for an Age Pension.

    Wise words Brian.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Lesmurdie - Perth WA
    Posts
    640
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 87County View Post
    There is a nearby thread on incomes that has prompted me to throw this in...

    We have our own super fund and have retired (because we needed to healthwise) on its proceeds and I could never get, and I still havn't got, a useful answer to this question

    "how much do we need to retire?"

    The answer from "advisers" seems predicated on handing the funds over to them and then they will pay us about 7% (bank interest) and keep the rest

    The accountant's smarta#se answer was always "if you have to ask you havn't got enough" - an answer common to the finance industry I gather and in fact the most annoying, frustrating and useless answer I can think of.

    The accountant said we should keep working (I wonder if that was as much to his benefit as ours)

    The tax treatment since 1 July means that the income from the fund is tax free (for over 60s) and the income from the fund's investments is also tax free and imputed tax on investments is repaid to the fund by the tax office

    Given that the stockmarket is growing at at least 20%pa (yes I know we can't count on to always do that but it has done for quite a few years now), it is possible to do projections of fund growth less pension pays so it shouldn't be too hard to give e$timates I would have thought.

    I didn't want to divert that other income thread. I noticed quite a few sensible posts on it so I would appreciate any opinions on this matter

    If the consensus is a lot higher than we have then we'll have to learn to survive on the govt pensions with part-time work I guess

    thanks
    Someone might think that these figures were plucked from somewhere dark. I have just been to a super retirement planning seminar and noted the following: If your annual income requirement is $30,000 then your super payout should be $492,914, or $40,000 super payout $657,219, or $50,000 super payout $821,523.
    I'll need to work for the next 15 years

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!