-
4th December 2007, 02:57 PM
#1
Popular sedans fail NRMA visibility test
Cop this Mr Scruby!
The NRMA has come out in favour of 5 top end 4x4 with 5 star ratings for rear visibility and simultaneously regular sedans have scored a big fat zero on the same study.
ABC Online - Popular sedans fail visibility test
Diana
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
-
4th December 2007, 03:25 PM
#2
Some small hatchbacks are the shocking too, with a high rear windscreen lower edge.
I was going to have a rant about people taking some responsibilty for their children's whereabouts in public spaces, that's going slightly off topic.
-
4th December 2007, 03:35 PM
#3
Mr. Scruby........ now there's a name I have sent abusive emails to before....lol.
-
4th December 2007, 04:02 PM
#4
just emailed todaytonight and ACA with that story,,,,
stuff'em.
-
4th December 2007, 08:04 PM
#5
Good on ya Pedro.
But I'll bet they don't use the info. Can't see how they can get a "beat up" out of this.
Cheers .........
BMKAL

-
4th December 2007, 08:18 PM
#6
I remember an NRMA test which named the Holden Commodore VT sedan shape one of the worst vehicles for rear vision.
My father in law always used to harp on about my dangerous 4wd (stock Holden Rodeo). I took great pride in pointing out this NRMA report as at the time he had just bought a VT Commodore sedan.
This is an article from the time
Commodore rates poorly in rear-vision study - theage.com.au
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
|
Search All the Web!
|
Bookmarks