procrastination inc wrote:
50,000 kids removed over about 70 yrs, some of them "stolen" counts as generations.
Unsnip
Hardly.
Anyway your logic will be tested by how many of these '50,000' seek compensation through the courts over the coming years.
Printable View
procrastination inc wrote:
50,000 kids removed over about 70 yrs, some of them "stolen" counts as generations.
Unsnip
Hardly.
Anyway your logic will be tested by how many of these '50,000' seek compensation through the courts over the coming years.
IMO this thread hilights the problem.
Too much too and fro, finger pointing and argument as to who was/is right and who/was is wrong.
None of it helps the plight of the aboriginal people.
A lot less 'debate' and a lot more action is what's needed.
The law suits may be the benefisheries of this!:(:angrylock:
groan ,,, going round in circles ...time to lock this one up I think mods
just so there is no confusion in anyone mind legal action for and behalf of any alleged stolen person has no connection with apology made by the PM.
the grounds for any legal action existed before the apology was made.
the courts will determine any compensation due based on individual merits of each case.
this is of course different to any Govt compensation fund set up to compensate for the any alleged stolen person such as established by the Tasmanian State Govt and being considered by by the WA and SA State Govts.
whether a apology was owed or due is irrelevant now its been given by the parliament supported by all sides of politics.