That is one of several reasons why there is no simple answer.
What works for one person in one situation might not be appropriate for another.
It's all very well for someone to say, " Well move to somewhere where houses are cheaper", but there could be a dozen reason why for some people that is not an option.
1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.
Fair enough. You have found an answer to the problem that works for you. Of course that is what we all should be doing, finding a solution that suits us.
That is a solution to your individual problem. What I meant is there is no simple, single answer to the broader problem.
1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.
As I said, different people need or find different solutions.
1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.
I agree, I just don't think the the solution should always be government based, which is what the original post was about (two hundred and something posts ago).
Absolutely spot-on!
To further your comments, many of those who don't spend their wages on a mortgage or high rent, due to sharing accommodation etc, have spending money to burn. This spending is what the Reserve Bank is trying to kurb via interest rate rises.
Unfortunately, the rate rises are affecting the wrong people so the spending will continue. This is not going to be an easy time, other measures will have to put in place, I don't know what these will be.
What is the average wage in the big mining centres? $100k? more? so if a house is roughly 5-6 times the annual wage, a halfway decent house should be at least 70% of this figure, or about $400k in these areas - otherwise the poor bugger building it is getting ripped off relative to the local market.
Dobbo has it spot on if you ask me - live within your means and there will be no problem. My wife and I for example are looking to buy a small two bedroom place in inner suburban melbourne within 12 months - why? because it will enable us to live (relatively) cheaply with short public transport commute times and less income tied into depreciating assets like cars. plus access to good, cheap education and (relatively) high earning professional jobs you can't obtain in country areas. We would still have complete access to our family property in the bush on the weekends (an hour or so away), so being shut into the city will not be a huge problem...
can't win em all though!!
Me. In Brisbane 300K does not get you much. In hindsight it was the right decision as our place has increased significantly in value over the last two years.
Oh, I have a new Land Rover, a big TV and I just put in a new kitchen. Plus my wife is leaving work soon as we have a baby on the way. I guess I'm the type of person that people blame for the interest rate rises? To me though I'm not too worried. I work hard for my money and I will spend it how I like. When rates get to 12% I'll start to get concerned. Although had I bought a 4-500K house like the bank wanted us to I would be very worried now.
Unfortunately, and people will probably flame me off the thread for this, but the government should be simply jacking-up the tax on fuel. It's the single most effective way of curbing discretionary spending as that will elevate the price of most goods and services overnight.
Fuel here is too cheap by far. We should by rights be charged maybe $2.50/l. This would have the double effect of reducing non-essential travel and raising the price of most things to slow the economy. The fuel tax level can be directly controlled by the government to keep inflation under control without the RBA having to simply resort to interest rate rises for the same effect.
The additional revenue from increased fuel tax is then available for spending on national infrastructure, but at a level that would not, in itself, counter-stimulate the economy which we are trying to slow down OR could be put towards a more effective and substantial first-home buyers' rebate.
We have a Prime Minister with 70% approval rating and a government with 60%+ approval. They are in a position to use this popularity to dish out some tough love to the country. It is early enough in their term that if they have the balls to do it and things smooth out in a couple of years, then they could still win re-election.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks