it wasnt a critasism, just an observation
Just curious, (we use a VMWare server @ work) VMWare uses it's own OS why would an Apple derived server, (didn't know they made them??) be more efficient than a standard Intel server?
Or did you mean don't use the "Apple" use VMWare to run windows?
BTW I agree, VMWare is quiteit has huge advantages.
Apple servers have been around for donkeys years. They have always done more than just Macs. The new breed are, well, just amazing - see here Apple XServe.
VMWare and Parallels allow for virtualisation. That means you can run any intel based OS; Windows, Linux, some Solaris, some BSDs, etc. And you can have various OSs installed and running at the same time or multiple editions of the same OS, such as on XServe.
Alan
2005 Disco 2 HSE
1983 Series III Stage 1 V8
I can & I do (sometimes), I just find I can make more working on other projects & platforms...
I've actually worked on a handful of nice OS X rollouts where I've designed & built a standard OS build for the Macs. 2,000 - 3,000 workstations (small by Windows standards but fair size Mac installations).
M
Mundane for you peeps, but I was checking out a 'young tech freak' site and so many young people have a quality screen and mac gear including something called the mini and it is their tv, movie player, hi fi, etcetera, they store huge volumes of movies and music, it seems to be the whole package!
Sounds intriguing!
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks