Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: A 4x4 is born flex pics.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Foot of the Otways
    Posts
    3,030
    Total Downloaded
    0

    A 4x4 is born flex pics.

    found these pics on a website . pretty impressive i think .


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Clifton Springs, Vic.
    Posts
    841
    Total Downloaded
    0
    MICK! You bought a Disco?????
    You Big GIRL!!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Foot of the Otways
    Posts
    3,030
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by kaa45 View Post
    MICK! You bought a Disco?????
    You Big GIRL!!!
    I had to get a disco ... It matches my red handbag

  4. #4
    RonMcGr Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by wannalandy View Post
    found these pics on a website . pretty impressive i think .

    I don't think I'd like to be in it if he had to do that on a track
    You know, sore back and all..

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    All show no go. Notice all the flex is in the rear, no flex in the front.

    Retained springs and a better front setup would give more balanced travel and better offroad performance.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Minchinbury NSW
    Posts
    1,032
    Total Downloaded
    0
    this is going to turn into a dislocation debate I can see it

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Singapore via Melbourne
    Posts
    1,938
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I says get the best of both worlds...

    X-Spring from X-eng...
    X-eng High Performance Off-Road Engineering

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    sunny Hobart
    Posts
    1,293
    Total Downloaded
    0
    these arent bad either from Rovertym website




  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    All show no go. Notice all the flex is in the rear, no flex in the front.

    Retained springs and a better front setup would give more balanced travel and better offroad performance.
    I totally agree. I would bet that front setup probably isn't that bad in isolation, but retaining the rear would actually force the front to work better than what it is.

    As a slightly more extreme (as in severe weight distribution inbalance) setup, this is a coil rear end I did, and retained it produced these results (on 38" Denman Ground Hawgs), where unretained the jack lifted the rear tyre about 30cm off the ground (not photographed) as the front didn't flex at all as there was nothing to counter twist against, and the rear coils just lifted rear. With inbalance like that you would get sooo much instability as the vehicle angle just matches the terrain angle that the front wheels are on, rather than the suspension flexing and balancing it between the front and rear. For a ramp setup... dislocation is probably fine.

    Actually, if anybody saw roothys roll at TTC last year, that was also a great example of a high flex but really unbalanced setup - just a text book example.





    Actually, if anybody saw roothys roll at TTC last year, that was also a great example of a high flex but really unbalanced setup - just a text book example.

    YouTube - Tuff Truck Challenge 2007 - Roothy Crash
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oatley, NSW
    Posts
    974
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Un balanced setup or not... I'm so jealous you you coil sprung geezers
    Stirling

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!