Originally Posted by
JDNSW
Like every accident, there was a chain (no pun intended) of events, and breaking the chain anywhere would have prevented the death. Just to note a few links in this chain:-
1. Putting the wheel over the edge in the first place.
2. Use of chain in an unsuitable application.
3. Failure to use a safety line in case of the chain breaking
4. Failure to use a seat belt.
5. Perhaps use of unrated chain or fittings or use of unsafe towing points (if these rather than the chain gave way)
And so on. My point is that you cannot say, with this, as with any accidental death, that there was a single "cause" and concentrate on it to the exclusion of the other links in the chain - in the next case, that particular link may not be present, but the one(s) ignored in the present investigation may have been just as important (although in this case, from the quoted reports, the use of chain and failure to wear a seat belt would seem to be the most important factors).
Chain actually has the advantage over other materials that it does not have much give, so that injury or damage from released strain (on breakage) is unlikely, as well as being very difficult to cut against rocks etc. But as pointed out, for vehicle recovery where shock loads may occur, and the possibility of the vehicle or anything else falling, it is not a good choice, although it may be good, for example, with a vehicle bogged on flat ground, and is definitely the choice for e.g. snigging strainer posts.
John