Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 52

Thread: to snorkle or not to snorkle?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by RonMcGr View Post
    I noticed there are a lot of answers to the original posters thread.
    Quite a few do not answer the guys question, on hid Discovery Series Two.

    Aerodynamics is not an issue, there are none!
    A Discovery is a "Blunt Vehicle", not like a Range Rover.

    The air cleaner pick up is a small "reversed trumpet" behind the front headlight.

    On this type of Land Rover, it does help in getting a free (unrestricted) flow, of cool, clean air.
    I am very happy with the results on my Discovery.
    disco2 is not setup like that. It draws air from the inner guard and there is no reversed trumpet setup in the system.I also agree with a previous comment suggesting a performance decrease on the D2, and I believe this is due to a poor match between the safari snorkel and the inner guard port which further restricts and already narrow passage.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    156
    Total Downloaded
    0

    the norkle debate

    thanks for the replies

    you made my day

  3. #33
    gumby190 Guest
    I have a snorkel on my old Series 2 & it has a positive effect on performance, the motor is a Holden 186, temps seem to have gone down a bit as well.

    The only problem I can see is that it sucks like a $2.00 wh#*e, some of the bugs it sucks in are pretty big. I reckon I could vacuum my floor with my snorkel.
    But really the price was the selling point - $10.55.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Aerodynamics and RRC in the same sentence now thats funny, i think LR was looking at a chipped brick when they designed the RRC. The "norkle " would be the least of your worries !
    Sigh ,yeah.
    But I can but try to get better economy.
    With all the things I have done and tried, It should be making fuel by now.

    I also filled in all the "vents" in the spoiler.
    Next I think I will make a bit of an undertray.

    I am seeing some results. Coming back from Canberra I got 16.2L per 100Km at 110 most of the way towing my 550KG Campomatic over the Range (without the airtabs fitted yet.)
    Of course going to Canberra into about a 60Kmh headwind I got 20L per 100Km.
    To recap
    RRC 92 3.9
    Thor Manifold, Unichip, Oxygen sensors,modded heads,raised intake,Filled in spoiler,NOW 30 x "airtabs", This on 245.75x16 ATKOs and 2 inch lift
    Regards Philip A

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, outer South East
    Posts
    2,283
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Numpty's Missus View Post
    Is that a custom hand made jobbie type norkel Wayne?
    that opens many possibilities but I'm not going there ... .

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    1,151
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    disco2 is not setup like that. It draws air from the inner guard and there is no reversed trumpet setup in the system.I also agree with a previous comment suggesting a performance decrease on the D2, and I believe this is due to a poor match between the safari snorkel and the inner guard port which further restricts and already narrow passage.
    So what about the other brands Like from TJm or Oppy Lock?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by mrapocalypse View Post
    So what about the other brands Like from TJm or Oppy Lock?
    Thats a really good question which I don't know the answer to. I can't imagine them being worse for fit.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  8. #38
    RonMcGr Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    disco2 is not setup like that. It draws air from the inner guard and there is no reversed trumpet setup in the system.I also agree with a previous comment suggesting a performance decrease on the D2, and I believe this is due to a poor match between the safari snorkel and the inner guard port which further restricts and already narrow passage.
    Well that setup could be a problem.
    I did not use all that was provided with the snorkel kit.
    I bought a flexible "Turbo" hose and used that instead, along with matching PVC pipe.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Ron is that a D1? I really like the way you've done it and it should breath really well. Do you have an external pic of the snorkel, or does it look standard from the outside? I haven't got any D2 pics... but just picture asthma.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  10. #40
    RonMcGr Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    Ron is that a D1? I really like the way you've done it and it should breath really well. Do you have an external pic of the snorkel, or does it look standard from the outside? I haven't got any D2 pics... but just picture asthma.
    Yes it is a D1
    The snorkel was the cheaper one.
    The Disco is running a lot better since I fitted it.
    I have enclosed a pic of the snorkel plus one of the vehicle in tow

    Cheers,
    Ron
    Attached Images Attached Images

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!