Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Who's been using the pool?

  1. #11
    solmanic's Avatar
    solmanic is offline One Merc post away from being banned...
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maleny, Queensland
    Posts
    2,912
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sprint View Post
    ugh..... dogs are one of the worst things that can get in a pool when it comes to keeping the water clean/sanitary
    I think you might be referring more to dead dogs which I believe sparked Sydney's giardia and crypstosporidium water crisis several years back.

    Living dogs that are well cared for (read disease free) are probably cleaner than most kids.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Heathcote (in "The Shire")
    Posts
    5,348
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by solmanic View Post
    I think you might be referring more to dead dogs which I believe sparked Sydney's giardia and crypstosporidium water crisis several years back.
    The 1998 giardia and cryptosporidium problem was caused by a significant influx of animal (cattle) faeces into the Warragamba storage after a long drought period when the 1997 drought broke in a quite significant rain event. Warragamba went from around 60% to full over a few weeks (and that was the last time it was full).


    Martyn

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney, NSW (nr Epping)
    Posts
    1,439
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I seem to remember (but have no evidence to support it) there was some question about the lab conducting the tests (the results varied widely day-to-day).

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tumbi Umbi, Central Coast, NSW
    Posts
    5,768
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The version of the story about Sydney's giardia (which anyone with access to the facts is free to refute if they like) is that in Sydney they were using a test that was sensitive enough to enable them to detect levels of giardia that places using less sensitive tests could not detect.

    The claim was that other places probably had as much giardia but weren't using a sensitive enough test to be able to detect it.

    As I said, that may not be true, but it makes a good story.
    Last edited by vnx205; 13th June 2008 at 05:11 PM. Reason: Yet another typo

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!